Film Review
Abel Gance's reputation as one of the world's leading avant-garde
filmmakers suffered irreparable harm when the director cast himself as
a modern Messiah in a film that was to be his biggest misfire.
La Fin du monde (a.k.a.
The End of the World) is pacifist
propaganda at its most hysterical and very nearly put paid to Gance's
career as a film director. The film was originally intended to be
a three hour long epic, made on a budget of five million francs with a
new stereophonic sound system pioneered by Gance.
Unfortunately, the producers lost patience with Gance and took it away
from him, drastically cutting it down to 105 minutes of barely
intelligible narrative pandemonium. The film could hardly escape
being a major critical and commercial failure, with the result that
Gance was toppled from his
grand
auteur pedestal and had no choice but to direct more
conventional films for the rest of his career, his subsequent work
being a pale shadow of his former achievements.
After its dismal performance in France,
La Fin du monde fared little
better when it was released in the United States by the American
distributor Harold Auten. On Auten's insistence, the film was
aggressively truncated to 54 minutes, which included a pointless ten
minute introduction by a scholarly astronomer, who elaborated on the
film's scientific content. The American version of the film,
titled
Paris After Dark,
replaces most of the spoken dialogue with numerous intertitles, which
only serve to render a totally confused film even more
unwatchable. In this version, the character played by Gance (the
Cocteau-like poet Jean Novalic) is virtually excised, and it could be
argued that this is a vast improvement. That
La Fin du monde has endured and
remains one of Gance's best-known films is almost entirely down to its
status as one of the earliest science-fiction films, a genre that is
particularly rare in French cinema.
Based on the 1894 novel
La Fin du
Monde (a.k.a.
Omega: The Last
Days of the World) by the astronomer Camille Flammarion, the
film was conceived as a warning against the forces that were driving
mankind towards a second, and possibly apocalyptic, global
conflagration, principally nationalism and capitalist greed. As
Abel Gance saw it, mankind had only one chance for survival: to band
together and form a single World Republic, in which all the nations of
the world are united in peaceful cooperation. It is a vision that
was shared by many other prominent writers and philosophers of the era,
most notably H.G. Wells. There is a striking overlap with Wells's
1933 novel
The Shape of Things to
Come, in which the world ends up being governed by an
intellectual elite. In the film, it is a scientist (an
astronomer) who proves to be mankind's saviour and helps to bring about
a new world order in which war is abolished. The alternative is
graphically illustrated in the tumult caused by a seemingly inescapable
natural catastrophe. Gance's thesis is that it is within man's
power to choose his destiny: peace and unity or complete obliteration.
Whilst Gance's motives are undoubtedly sincere, he pretty well
decimates his arguments through a combination of political naivety and
artistic self-indulgence. In comparison with his earlier anti-war
piece
J'Accuse (1919),
La Fin du monde lacks clarity and
leaves the spectator as hopelessly confused as the maelstrom of images
and ideas it carelessly throws onto the screen. Gance does
himself no favours by casting himself as Jesus Christ in the opening
sequence - any film director who presents himself as the Son of God and
shows himself being nailed to a cross is asking for trouble. As
the poet Jean Novalic, Gance is reduced to playing a self-pitying form
of himself, pathetically lamenting his inability to convince others of
his belief that mankind is doomed unless he changes his ways.
Doubtless the film's jumbled narrative is the result of the last minute
editing that was done after the producers took the film away from its
director, but the wafer-thin characterisation, laboured moralising and
overly simplistic politics are entirely Gance's.
We can forgive the film its technical imperfections - this was after
all Gance's first experience of sound cinema and hardly any sound film
made around this time was any better - but its rambling narrative and
grandiose preachiness are much harder to stomach. Gance does
manage to redeem himself, partly, in the film's spectacular last
fifteen minutes, which demonstrate the director's special talent for
montage. Combining reasonably convincing model shots with stock
footage of a variety of natural disasters, Gance gives his film a
visually arresting climax. By cleverly distorting the images
(possibly with the help of flexible mirrors) the joins between the
different shots are cunningly hidden and the end result is remarkably
fluid, a kaleidoscopic frenzy of chaos and terror that is utterly
riveting, on a par with anything you will find in today's more
convincing disaster movies. Unfortunately, to get to this
artistic highpoint the spectator has to sit through around ninety
minutes of aimless to-ing and fro-ing in what vaguely resembles a badly
cut version of a Louis Feuillade serial from the mid 1910s.
Today, the impression the film makes is very different to what Gance
had intended. Far from being the enlightened hero who would guide
mankind to a new and happier dawn, the central character Martial
Novalic has many of the characteristics we would associate with a
totalitarian leader. By announcing the end of the world, he
creates a climate of fear which he then uses for his own political ends
(benign as they may be). He exploits the media available to him
(newspapers and radio) to the full in his remorseless propaganda
campaign, and even ends up killing his political opponents in cold
blood. Martial's sombre announcement that the world has only 114
days left to Armageddon instantly reminds us of another (real-life)
merchant of doom and his famous 45 minute warning. The World
Republic that Martial instigates at the end of the film is not far
removed from the Fascist regimes that had begun to take control of
continental Europe at the time. Quite unintentionally,
La Fin du monde is chillingly
prescient, and surprisingly relevant to our own time. It is not,
as Gance had wished, a film that illuminates a path to Utopia.
Rather, it is one that warns us against false prophets -
particularly those who resort to playing the fear card to achieve their
misguided political objectives. It is they who are the real
threat mankind faces, not rogue comets from the other side of the
galaxy.
© James Travers 2012
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Next Abel Gance film:
Le Maître de forges (1933)
Film Synopsis
The astronomer Martial Novalic is horrified when he discovers that a
comet is on a collision course with planet Earth. With only 114
days to impact, Martial sets about trying to alert humanity to the
encroaching disaster, but his efforts are frustrated by the
unscrupulous stockholder Schomburg, who hopes to capitalise on an
impending war between the major powers. Coincidentally, Martial's
brother, the poet and actor Jean Novalic, has foreseen the apocalypse,
but no one paid any attention to his lunatic ravings. With his
brother confined to an asylum, Martial commits himself to creating a
new World Republic in which all the nations of the world are united in
peace, on the off-chance that mankind may survive the collision with
the comet. Once the comet becomes visible, order begins to break
down across the globe. Whilst some pray for a miracle, others
abandon themselves to the pleasures of the flesh. Meanwhile, the
comet comes ever closer, bringing death and devastation in its
wake...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.