Film Review
In 1980, the year in which Bertrand Tavernier's film
Death Watch (a.k.a.
La Mort en direct), was released, the phrase 'reality television'
hadn't yet been coined. It wasn't until a full decade later that the
genre took off, with crowd-pulling shows like
Survivor and
Big
Brother. Now of course Reality TV is endemic, filling up television
schedules every day of the week and providing cheap vicarious thrills for
audiences who obviously delight in watching ordinary Joes and Jills making
complete prats of themselves on prime time TV. Based on David Compton's
novel
The Continuous Katherine Mortenhoe, Tavernier's film (and some
others made around this time, notably Yves Boisset's
Le Prix du danger (1983))
anticipated the emergence of this new form of mass entertainment and tentatively
lifted the lid on the host of moral issues it raises.
Death Watch was Bertrand Tavernier's fifth feature and, more significantly,
the first of his English language films. The film was shot in Scotland,
an ideal location as it provides the contrasting settings for its two halves
- first the scenes of post-industrial decline mirroring society's irreversible
moral decay (filmed on the depressing urban wastes on the outskirts of Glasgow)
and then the stunning natural splendour of the Scottish countryside.
Tavernier's cinematographer Pierre-William Glenn achieves the greatest visual
impact from these two starkly different settings but somehow he also manages
to endow them both with the same unrelenting aura of repression and melancholy.
It is the film's eerily oppressive ambiance that gives it its distinctive
feel, presenting us with a world that is similar to our own and yet oddly
different. It is so easy to believe this is how the world will be within
a few years, a soulless wilderness in which human beings are losing their
capacity to feel and show real emotion, the result of technological progress
assisting and accelerating society's moral degeneration towards the abyss.
Worthy film though it is, the impact of
Death Watch is somewhat diminished
by Tavernier's penchant for overly grandiose mise-en-scène, which
renders parts of the film absurdly operatic. Offsetting these unnecessary
directorial grandeurs are exemplary performances from two of the most compelling
screen actors of the day, Romy Schneider and Harvey Keitel, both of whom
were having to cope with severe professional and personal difficulties at
the time. (Both had good reason to resent media intrusion in their
lives.) It's hard to imagine two more contrasting actors - Keitel was
the keenest advocate of the Method, Schneider a purely instinctive performer.
This, together with the fact that they reportedly had a strained working
relationship, makes their on-screen rapport all the more brittle and poignant.
Defying a script that is too wordy and intellectual by half, both actors
bring an extraordinary reality to their performances. Their characters'
on-going love-hate conflict, which ultimately attains the proportions of
a Greek tragedy, brings home the terrifying destructive power that the media
has over us, manipulating and controlling us like puppets for its dubious,
if not downright evil, ends.
One of the reasons why
Death Watch makes such uncomfortable viewing
is that, in addition to foreseeing the dismal decline in television tastes
it also spookily presages the untimely demise of its lead actress.
The scene in which William Russell bluntly tells Romy Schneider she will
soon die can hardly fail to send a shiver down the spine. At the time
she made this film, the actress was at her most powerful, a vigorous performer
and a picture of charm and vitality. Yet within just over two years
she would appear to age ten years through a series of terrible personal disasters
(including the violent death of her young son, who incidentally appears briefly
in the film) and then die suddenly from a heart attack, in circumstances
that still haven't been fully elucidated. There's a striking similarity
(too horrible to dwell on) between the fate of the actress and that of the
character she portrays in Tavernier's film, and this is the one aspect of
the film that makes it so incredibly difficult to watch.
An outspoken polemicist with deep convictions, Bertrand Tavernier has never
been one to shy away from bleak and controversial subjects but
Death Watch
is by far his darkest and most disturbing film - perhaps even more so today
now that its grimly speculative vision of the future has become a near certainty.
Not only does it foresee the rise of Reality TV, and the depths to which
it will inevitably sink (with death becoming the 'new pornography' once the
mystique of sex has become completely eradicated), it serves as a cautionary
tale on the power of the media to control people's lives and shape our reality
for its own profit - in a way that is highly corrosive to individuals (those
who watch and participate) and society in general. The vision that
Tavernier conjures up is a sorry future in which personal privacy has been
completely abolished through the omnipresence of the camera and where just
about anything goes for media executives hooked on the goal of achieving
ever greater profits. Of course this warped vision is no longer the
stuff of science fiction but a terrible fact of life. Three decades on,
we are now living with the reality of
Death Watch, and
the most worrying thing about it is that we hardly seem to mind.
© James Travers 2016
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Next Bertrand Tavernier film:
Coup de torchon (1981)
Film Synopsis
Mindful of the need to drive up his network's viewing figures, television
producer Vincent Ferriman has devised a new reality TV show named
Death
Watch in which he will beam into people's homes the last days of a terminally
ill person. The subject he selects must obviously be young and good-looking,
preferably female, so he opts for Katherine Mortenhoe, a famous writer in
her mid-thirties. Katherine can hardly believe her doctor when he tells
her she has contracted an incurable disease. How can such a thing be
possible in an age when virtually all illnesses have been eradicated?
The writer barely has time for this news to sink in before Vincent makes
his move and tries to sign her up for his television show. Appalled
by the very idea of having her death filmed for entertainment, Katherine
rejects the producer's offer and takes flight, heading for the rundown outer
precincts of the city.
In a scene of dismal urban decay, Katherine passes herself off as a
vagrant and encounters a sympathetic man of her own age named Roddy.
They strike up an immediate friendship and continue their journey together.
Unbeknown to Katherine, Roddy is in the employ of Vincent Ferriman and has
a camera implanted in his brain which allows him to relay everything he sees
to television sets across the land. Confident that she has managed
to outwit Ferriman, Katherine undertakes a long journey across country to
the remote house of her ex-husband, Gerald. When Roddy catches a glimpse
of Katherine's
Death Watch experiences on television he is so disgusted
that he has no choice but to confront the writer with the truth. No
sooner has Katherine opened her heart to her understanding former spouse
than she receives a telephone call from NTV to notify her that she has been
the victim of a cruel deception...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.