Film Review
Preceded by expectations and hype that it couldn't possibly live up to,
Gaspar Noé's 3D erotic melodrama
Love was bound to be the French
cinema non-event of the year. Not so much
Fifty Shades of Grey as
Umpteen Shades of Beige,
Noé's latest attempt to live up to his
enfant terrible reputation sees
lurid but tastefully composed sex scenes (some apparently
non-simulated) crowbarred into what is probably the most painfully
over-earnest meditation on the transience of romantic love ever.
The director's boast that the script ran to just seven pages might
explain why watching this film is just about the emptiest and most
unrewarding experience you can imagine. Even the occasional
bursts of artistic brilliance (something that even a director as
self-conscious as Noé is prone to) and a pile of good intentions
cannot make up for the lumbering bore fest that is
Love.
Lacking in entertainment value it may be, but the film certainly has
some worth as aversion therapy for porn addicts. Having sat
through over two hours of life-sapping tedium in which roughly half of
the runtime is preoccupied with sex scenes repeated ad nauseum (mostly
configurations of standard heterosexual coupling with a coy smidgen of
lesbianism thrown in by way of variation), the spectator's appetite for
pornographic stimulation is likely to be quenched for life. To
give credit where it is due, Noé shows how we should deal with
all taboo subjects - repeat them
over and over and over and over and over again until they become so
excruciatingly anaemic that they cease to arouse any interest
whatsoever. If, after making sex appear as dull and routine as
mowing the lawn, the director could repeat the exercise with cancer,
assisted suicide and the biggest no-no of them all - death - he'd
probably be doing the human race a great service.
There will doubtless be a few sad wretches (living in parts of the
world as yet untainted by internet porn) who will be turned on by
Noé's coitus calamity but, for all their abundance, the film's
sex scenes are astoundingly unarousing. Imaginatively shot from
various angles, but never showing anything that might possibly result
in the film getting an 18 certificate - the innumerable body
entanglements are more artistic (in the purist sense of the word) than
pornographic, with acres of skin and sinew more resembling some
abstract mechanical construct than something as mundane as copulating
human beings. Even the film's most obvious flirtation with hard
core porn - a 3D shot of a tumescent male member disgorging itself
apparently over our heads - appears too weirdly abstract to have any
sexual connotations. If Noé's intention was to turn sex
into mere art, he succeeded well beyond his wildest dreams.
In fact, Gaspar Noé's main motivation for making the film was to
portray sex as a beautiful part of a loving relationship. He got
the sex part of the equation right but unfortunately he seems to have
totally overlooked the relationship part. His seven page script
clearly didn't allow for much sophistication on either the narrative or
character fronts, so inevitably we get a facile
ménage-à-trois
situation involving three of the shallowest and most boring individuals
you can imagine. Now, with a respectable trio of lead actors
Noé might just have got away with this, but unfortunately he
throws himself at the tender mercies of two actresses who have no prior
acting experience and patently could not act if their lives depended on
it - Aomi Muyock and Klara Kristin - and a more experienced actor, Karl
Glusman, whose acting skills are barely discernible. Putting
these three unsympathetic so-called thespians together and expecting
them to improvise their own dialogue looks like a sure-fire recipe for
disaster. Glusman's gushing verbal assaults, replete with the
kind of forced grandiloquence that is more likely to induce multiple
bouts of vomiting than admiration, are not something for the
faint-hearted or suicidally inclined. Watching
Love with an earplug
firmly planted in both ears to block out the excruciating dialogue can
only enhance your experience of the film. A sturdy blindfold
and a handful of sleeping tablets may also help.
Love promises to be as
provocative as Noé's three previous films -
Seul
contre tous (1998),
Irréversible (2002) and
Enter the Void (2009) - but what it
actually delivers is something far less spectacular - a lamentably
unengaging, badly constructed melodrama that is barely sustained by a
succession of graphic sex scenes that are no more shocking these days
than a nude painting by Gustave Courbet. The director's trademark
visual flair occasionally bursts through the dross and momentarily has
us spellbound, but these moments are too rare and too fleeting to make
the film worth the effort.
Love
is essentially no more than a full-frontal descent into mediocrity - and
maybe this is the most shocking thing about bad boy Noé's latest
feature.
© James Travers 2015
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Next Gaspar Noé film:
Seul contre tous (1998)
Film Synopsis
On the morning of the 1st of January, the telephone rings. Murphy
wakes up with his young wife and their two-year-old child. On the
answer phone there is a message from Electra's anxious mother asking if
there has been any news about her daughter, who has been missing for
some time and who might well be in the gravest of trouble. During
a long, rainy day, Murphy finds himself alone in his apartment and
recalls the most important romance of his life, two years with
Electra...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.