Film Review
One of the most lavish historical dramas ever made, this ambitious
adaptation of Robert K. Massie's epic novel remains cinema's most
thorough and compelling account of the Russian Revolution.
With its stunning production values, the film conveys not only the
turmoil of the period with graphic brilliance, but also vividly evokes
the anguish of the players caught up in this drama - not just the Tsar
and his entourage, but the ordinary people of Russia. It is a
shame that the film's visual impact is undermined by a mediocre
screenplay, which drags the pace to a lumbering crawl in the second
half of the film and fails to make the main protagonists much more than
caricatures of their real-life historical counterparts.
Franklin J. Schaffner's direction is effective but lacks the inspired
touch he showed on his previous two great films -
Planet of the Apes (1969) and
Patton (1970). By
contrast, his cinematographer, Freddie Young, excels himself, achieving
the same eye-pleasing artistry that he brought to his collaborations
with David Lean, on such films as
Lawrence of Arabia (1962) and
Doctor Zhivago (1965).
Young's work is complemented by the film's Oscar-winning art direction
and costumes, which also contribute greatly to the mood and opulence of
the film.
Surprisingly, the failings in the screenplay do not greatly tarnish the
performances. Whilst some of the dialogue may seem trite and
slightly absurd there is hardly a single character in this film who is
not portrayed with the utmost conviction. It is hard to believe
that this is Michael Jayston's first (and only) leading film
role. Better known for his stage work, Jayston shows here that he
is also a very capable screen actor. He has a magisterial screen
presence that makes him an ideal casting choice for the role of the
last Tsar of Russia. Jayston's scenes with Janet Suzman, another
remarkable actor (best remembered for her TV work), are easily the most
moving, bringing a humanity and realism which are lacking elsewhere in
the film. And who better to play the debauched mad monk Rasputin
than Tom Baker? The future Doctor Who pretty well steals the show
with a performance that seethes with a manic intensity and the kind of
wide-eyed religious fervour that would now earn you a one-way ticket to
Guantanamo Bay. The supporting cast reads like a
Who's Who (no pun intended) of
British acting talent, including such legendary performers as Laurence
Olivier, Michael Redgrave and Jack Hawkins.
Nicholas and Alexandra is an
outstanding production, a gripping tale of court intrigue and human tragedy
played against a backdrop of monumental proportions. The film has often been criticised for
its length, but it is hard to see how the story could have been told in
a shorter space without sacrificing historical accuracy or dramatic
impact. It may drag a little in places, some of the characters
may be too thinly sketched to be credible, but such is the visual power
and emotional restraint of the film that such failings are easily
forgiven. The simplicity and total lack of sentimentality in the final sequence,
depicting the tragic fate of the Romanov family, is ultimately what
makes this film so poignant and memorable.
© James Travers 2010
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Film Synopsis
In 1904 Tsar Nicholas II of Russia ignores the advice of his closest
allies and launches a war against Japan to protect his nation's
interest in Korea. It is a war that will cost thousands of lives
and marks the beginning of the end of the reign of the tsars.
Coincidentally, this is the year in which Nicholas becomes more
confident of the succession, through the birth of his son Alexei.
But it is a fragile succession built on hope and fear, for Alexei
suffers from hemophilia and could die if he incurs even the slightest
injury. With both Nicholas and his consort Alexandra preoccupied
with their son, political events soon begin to over take the
Tsar. Unrest is growing amongst the ordinary people of
Russia, fuelled by Alexandra's patronage of the mystic Grigori Rasputin.
Meanwhile, covert political
organisations plot the downfall of
Tsar Nicholas and the creation of a new Communist state. When a
peaceful protest at the Winter Palace ends in a bloody massacre, the
spirit of revolution fills the air of Russia. The country's
losses in the First World War provide Nicholas's enemies with the
opportunity they need to take power from him and so bring an end to
three centuries of Romanov rule...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.