Film Review
Shadow of a Doubt is quite
possibly the most perfectly constructed, certainly one of the darkest,
of the suspense thrillers that Alfred Hitchcock directed during his
time in Hollywood. Hitchcock in fact cited the film as his
personal favourite, and it's perhaps not too difficult to see
why. With its juxtaposition of the cosy world of an ordinary
American family and the twisted mental hinterland of a dangerous
psychopath, where the most menacing character in the story is also the
most sympathetic, the film is pure Hitchcock. The director's
fascination with the darker side of human nature, that uncontrollable
perversity for mayhem and destruction which reveals itself in many of
his films, is clearly the inspiration and driving force behind this
taut psychological thriller, one of his many cinematic masterpieces.
Appropriately for a film that revolves around the conflict between good
and evil, light and dark,
Shadow of
a Doubt is shot as a film noir, and indeed it is one of the most
attractive examples of American film noir. The film features some
of the most imaginative camerawork in any of Hitchcock's films -
including some stunning crane shots which perfectly evoke how the
protagonists feel when their view of the world around them suddenly
changes, from the familiar to the alarmingly unexpected.
Whilst it has many of Hitchcock's recognisable trademarks,
Shadow of a Doubt also has a
bleakness and realism that sets it apart from many of the director's
other films, certainly his later, more commercial films. The use
of a real location - Santa Rosa - contributes greatly to the film's
impact, as does Thornton Wilder's excellent screenplay and a sublime
cast, which includes no major Hollywood stars but some hugely talented
character actors. In one of his few villainous roles,
Joseph Cotton brilliantly captures the dual-sided persona of Uncle
Charlie - avuncular and slightly creepy (in the way that most uncles
are), quite different to his instantly likeable portrayal in Orson
Welles's
The Magnificent Ambersons
(1942).
As Uncle Charlie's doting sister, Patricia Collinge is the epitome of
the ordinary middle class American housewife, so absorbed by the
routine of her humdrum life that she is totally incapable of seeing
anything wrong in her brother's behaviour. If Uncle Charlie spent
an evening dismembering Asiatic virgins in his bedroom, all she would
notice is that the bed linen needed changing. Henry Travers
and Hume Cronyn make an enjoyable comic double act, the perfect vehicle
for Hitchcock's subversive black humour - amiably they discuss how to
perpetrate the perfect murder whilst a seasoned serial killer sits
quietly in their midst. One of the many joys the film has
to offer is the depth of characterisation and the brilliance with which
every character is portrayed by these great actors.
Perhaps he film's strength lies in the fact that the nature of the
threat only really becomes apparent towards the end. Much of what
we see is shown from the perspective of a highly emotional adolescent
young woman (Young Charlie), and so there is an element of uncertainty
over whether the danger she senses is real or imagined.
Hitchcock's films often include a degree of subjectivity, so we
can never be sure whether we should believe everything that we
see. This ambiguity is accentuated by Joseph Cotton's
performance, which combines urbane charm with a suggestion of something
sinister, and the way in which all of the other characters, notably
Uncle Charlie's sister, see him as someone presenting no danger at
all. In fact, it is only right at the end of the film that the
ambiguity is resolved and the last shadow of doubt is removed, in a
typically Hitchcockian life-and-death climax.
The unwillingness of an audience to accept a character as being truly
bad is something that Hitchcock exploits time and again in his films,
and to devastating effect. Like the seemingly harmless Norman
Bates in
Psycho (1960), Uncle
Charlie is portrayed not as the villain, but as a character we want to
see vindicated as an innocent man. The shock revelation that he
is not Snow White doesn't diminish our sympathy for him, or our desire
for a happy outcome for him. This strange dichotomy is central to
many of Hitchcock's films - our sympathies are torn between the good
guy and the bad guy, and often we see more of ourselves in the bad
guy. Few film directors have probed the nature of evil with
greater insight and intelligence than Hitchcock, a fact that his many
great films will amply demonstrate.
© James Travers 2008
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Next Alfred Hitchcock film:
Lifeboat (1944)