Film Review
Although Hammer's production of
Dracula (1958) had been a huge
box office hit, the company (like Universal before them) were strangely
reluctant to embark on an immediate sequel. Hammer
may have been unwilling to put all their eggs into one basket (although this is
ultimately what happened), but the company may also have been deterred by a
spate of similar vampire-themed movies released by its
competitors. When Hammer
did
decide to make a sequel, Christopher Lee, the actor who had played the
part of the vampiric Count so successfully, refused categorically to
have anything to do with it. Lee was so associated with the part
of Dracula that it would have been too big a risk to replace him with
another actor. So (just as in the case of Universal in the
mid-1930s), Hammer faced the challenge of making a sequel to their
first
Dracula film without
Dracula actually appearing in it.
Hammer were still able to count (no pun intended) on the services of
Peter Cushing, whose authoritative portrayal of Dr Van Helsing had
contributed as much to the success of
Dracula
as Christopher Lee's majestic vampire turn. Terence Fisher, who
had directed that film with such aplomb, was enthusiastic about making
a sequel, and Hammer's crew of technicians could be relied upon to make
a prestige-looking production on a modest budget. The only
headache was the screenplay, which had to go through numerous rewrites
by several different writers. It is little wonder that the film's
plot is a tangled mess which only just holds together.
The deficiencies in the script are remarkably easy to overlook, given
the strengths of the film in other areas. With its slick design,
sumptuous sets and well-staged action scenes,
The Brides of Dracula stands as one
of Hammer's most visually impressive Gothic horror offerings.
Jack Asher's cinematography makes it appear a far more lavish
production that it was and brings a sinister brooding menace to almost
every scene. Peter Cushing commands such authority that you never
doubt the danger posed by the vampiric Baron Meinster, even if David
Peel's portrayal lacks the subtle terror of Lee's Dracula.
Martita Hunt is much more sinister as the Baron's creepy mother, a part
that calls to mind her best-known role, Miss Havisham in David Lean's
Great Expectations
(1946). Freda Jackson hits just the right note of unbridled
lunacy in her all-too brief appearance as the overly enthusiastic
housekeeper. It is a pity that actress Yvonne Monlaur looks
as if she is starring in a naughty French comedy, since her obvious
insouchiance does diminish the fear
quotient somewhat. (Having said that, it might have been a nice
twist if the vampire protagonists were all slain by a lethal burst of
Gallic indifference.)
The familiar motifs from Stoker's original
Dracula novel and vampire folklore
are ingeniously re-used (the sails of a windmill providing an
improvised crucifix, for example). There is much more explicit
horror that in the first
Dracula
film (and almost as much explicit comedy). Here we not only get
to see a vampire impaled, but we are also treated to the sight of Van
Helsing cauterising a vampire bite on his neck with a red hot
poker. In fact, there are so many thrills and shocks that you
hardly notice Christopher Lee's absence at all. Of course, Lee
would return to resurrect his most famous creation six years later, in
Dracula: Prince of Darkness (1966),
kicking off a new cycle of Dracula films that would ultimately have
Bram Stoker spinning in his grave.
© James Travers 2010
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Next Terence Fisher film:
The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll (1960)
Film Synopsis
Count Dracula may have been destroyed but his legacy of vampiric evil
endures, lingering like a poisonous cloud of death over the bleak
Transylvanian landscape. Marianne Danielle, a young French
schoolteacher, knows nothing of this and makes the journey to the
girls' school where she it to take up her new post in blissful
ignorance of the dangers that surround her. When her coach
driver abandons her at a village inn, she gratefully accepts an
invitation from the aged Baroness Meinster to spend the night at her
castle. Marianne is appalled when she learns that the Baroness
keeps her son chained up in his room and sets about finding the key
that will release him. What she doesn't know is that, far from
being an innocent captive, Baron Meinster is a blood-hungry vampire who
has been kept alive by titbits fed to him by his mother. Once freed,
the Baron wastes no time seeking out his next victim, a girl in the
village. With the help of a passing vampire hunter, Dr. Van
Helsing, Marianne manages to reach her school unharmed. A short while
later, Marianne is visited by Baron Meinster and is delighted when he
asks her to marry him...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.