Film Review
Whilst it is generally not considered one of the better Bond movies,
The Living Daylights did represent
a serious attempt on the part of its production team to inject new life
into the franchise and move away from the jokey comic book approach
that marked Roger Moore's tenure in the role. The casting of
Timothy Dalton, an actor with a much darker screen persona than Moore,
certainly helped to re-instil a sense of realism and danger in the
character, and the screenwriters did a reasonable job of reorienting
the series back towards Ian Fleming's original concept. Out go
all the bikini wearing beauties and tedious Carry On-style
innuendo. In their place, we have a gritty, far more respectable
attempt at a Cold War action thriller.
Unfortunately, the reset button wasn't so much pressed as trodden on by
a herd of elephants. In their attempt to make a more serious kind
of Bond film, production team somewhat overestimated the intelligence
of their average audience (if your IQ score is less than 120, don't
even bother trying to understand the plot) and were a little too
ruthless when it came to strangling all the jokes at birth.
The Living Daylights is impressive
as an action movie, but you'd be hard pressed to find many people who
thought it was fun. A smattering of humour would have helped make
the convoluted plot a little more bearable. But no, the film soon
feels as arid and featureless as the Afghan landscape in which the
latter part of the action takes place.
It is customary these days to lump Timothy Dalton in with George
Lazenby as an actor who failed to do anything with the part of Bond and
is therefore best forgotten. However, when you watch Dalton in
his two Bond films it is apparent almost from his first scene that he
was a much more interesting and dynamic 007 than Moore and Brosnan ever
were. Dalton's misfortune was to enter the Bond franchise at a
time when it was way overdue for a major overhaul and the production
team were not quite certain where to take the series. If Dalton
had been given a script with the quality of the early Bond movies, and
a supporting cast to match, he might well have earned himself the
mantle of the definitive James Bond.
The Living Daylights has two
central weaknesses - an absurdly overcomplicated plot which runs all
over the place without much logic, and cast of undistinguished and
uninteresting actors, most of whom looks as if they'd rather be
elsewhere. Maryam d'Abo looks like a deadweight around Dalton's
heels and deserves to be considered the dullest of the Bond girls, just
as Joe Don Baker probably rates as the dullest Bond villain.
© James Travers 2010
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Film Synopsis
In Bratislava, agent James Bond is tasked with protecting General
Koskov, a KGB officer, as he defects to the West. Having made it
safely to England, Koskov informs the British secret service that the
new head of the KGB, General Pushkin, has revived an old policy of
killing western agents. Koskov is then abducted, apparently by
KGB agents, and Bond is instructed by his superiors to assassinate
Pushkin during his stay in Tangier. Bond's suspicions that things
are not what they seem are confirmed when he learns that Koskov has
links with the illicit American arms dealer General Whitaker. The
latter has just received a large cash payment from Puskin to supply him
with the latest in American military weaponry, armaments that will
allow the Soviets to win the war in Afghanistan. However, Pushkin
no longer trusts Whitaker and demands that his money be returned.
As the arms dealer requires this money to buy a large consignment of
opium in Afghanistan, he decides that Pushkin must die. How
fortunate that Bond should do the job for him...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.