Film Review
John Huston's classic 1941 film
The
Maltese Falcon certainly lives up to its reputation as one of
the all time greats of Hollywood.
Not only does it represent one of the most important landmarks in the history of American cinema, but
it is quite possibly the most perfect, the most compelling and the most
satisfying detective film ever made.
The film marked not only the directorial debut of John Huston, but its
commercial success propelled the second rank actor Humphrey Bogart to
stardom, launched the Hollywood careers of Sydney Greenstreet and Peter
Lorre, and laid the foundations of American film noir. Not bad
going for a film that was made on a tight budget by a rookie
director.
In the years prior to the making of
The
Maltese Falcon, John Huston had established a solid reputation
as a screenwriter, on such films as Raoul Walsh's
High Sierra (1941) and Howard
Hawks's
Sergeant York
(1941). Huston was keen to start making films and it was Howard
Hawks who suggested he try an adaptation of Dashiell Hammett's novel
The Maltese Falcon.
This would be Warner Brothers' third adaptation of Hammett's novel in
ten years. Roy Del Ruth had directed the first version,
The Maltese Falcon (1931), starring
Bebe Daniels and Ricardo Cortez. This was followed by William
Dieterle's
Satan Met a Lady
(1936), a comic re-interpretation which starred Bette Davis and Warren
William. Both of these versions bore little resemblance to
Hammett's novel and neither achieved success at the box office.
Interestingly, it was the cinematographer on the second version, Arthur
Edeson, who would work on Huston's film.
Huston was keen to capture the hard-boiled character of Hammett's
original novel. Hammett himself had worked as a private detective
(for the famous Pinkerton agency) before becoming a writer, so he
brought a realism to the detective genre which had previously been
lacking. Huston was able to retain this realism in his film
adaptation by adhering as closely as possible to the novel and by
imaginative use of lighting and photography. The distinctive look
which Huston and his cinematographer Arthur Edeson came up with for
this film is what we now know as
film
noir.
Film noir was a development of the cinematographic style used by German
expressionist filmmakers in the 1920s. Essentially, it consists
of harsh lighting (emphasising extreme contrasts of mood and moral
viewpoint in the narrative), low camera angles (suggesting dominance of
one character over another) and asymmetric composition (implying a
sense of anxiety and derangement through loss of harmony).
Together, these elements create the impression of tension and conflict,
amplifying the inner moods and feelings of the characters in the drama.
Huston's use of film noir is so brilliant in this film, so perfectly
suited to the world of the solitary private detective, that many other
directors would follow his lead. Hollywood of the 1940s would be
greatly influenced by film noir technique, and the distinctive noir
style would be emulated and developed by filmmakers throughout the
world, and is still referenced in modern cinema.
The Maltese Falcon is equally
famous for establishing Humphrey Bogart as one of Hollywood's leading
actors in the 1940s. When he made this film the actor was 42 and
had already appeared in 40 films, usually as the bad guy, known for his
tough gangster portrayals in such films as
The Roaring Twenties
(1939). Bogart was only offered the part after several other
actors, notably George Raft, turned it down. Raft would also
reject the lead in
Casablanca
(1942), the part which made Bogart into a legend.
With a dual persona that combines a rough outward cynicism with a
subtle inner emotional warmth, Bogart's Sam Spade is the archetypal
antihero, and Bogart brilliantly conveys the complexities, the
contradictions and the moral ambiguities of his character in a way that
virtually no actor of his era could have done. Bogart and Huston
became good friends and would work together on other films:
The Treasure of the Sierra Madre
(1948),
Key Largo (1948)
and
The African Queen (1951).
Bogart's isn't the only great performance
The Maltese Falcon has to
offer. His three co-stars have almost as much to contribute to
the success of the film as he does. Mary Astor makes a sublime
femme fatale, exuding dark, deadly duplicity and a seductive sensuality
in every shot. Peter Lorre is both chilling and comical as the
mercurial henchman Joel Cairo. It was this role which established
him in Hollywood; he had previously been known for his sinister
portrayal the child killer in Fritz Lang's
M (1930). And then
there's Sydney Greenstreet, deliciously menacing yet utterly charming
as the villainous Kasper Gutman (the part than won him an Oscar
nomination). Remarkably, this was the first screen role for the
61-year old British stage actor. Greenstreet was so successful in
the role that he would appear in many other films in Hollywood, usually
as the urbane obese villain, and often partnered with Peter Lorre:
Casablanca (1942),
Passage to Marseille (1944) and
The Verdict (1946). John
Huston's father, the great director Walter Huston, appears briefly as
Captain Jacobi, the man who hands Bogart the troublesome bird-shaped
statuette.
What is perhaps most striking about
The
Maltese Falcon is its extraordinary efficiency. With few
set changes and hardly any physical action, the film's relentless pace
comes almost entirely from the rapid delivery of the lines (Bogart
belts out lines faster than a machine gun splutters bullets) and the
most effective composition of shots. The impression is a mood of
continual conflict and uncertainty, with four characters engaged in a
game of intrigue and deceit, with no one having a clear idea about what
is going on. The film is daring for its time in that the familiar
boundaries of good and evil are completely blurred - a sense of
moral ambiguity which would become
closely associated with film noir.
The film also works as a morality play. The frantic hunt for the
falcon statuette symbolises the worst side of human nature - greed, the
placing of material wealth above those intangible things that make life
worth living. The film shows us the destructive impact of this
deadly vice on the four characters, whose love of money lures them into
a fruitless treasure hunt. By the time Sam and Brigid (the most
sympathetic of the four main characters) realise what they have lost,
it is too late; they are both emotionally destroyed. At least
they manage to escape the fate that befalls Gutman and Cairo, whose
futile quest will go on forever, an utterly pointless existence.
The Maltese Falcon is the
definitive detective film and an incisive exploration of the human
psyche. Its use of film noir techniques may have been emulated
but they have seldom been used as effectively as in this film.
With its arresting performances, stylish cinematography and thoroughly
absorbing narrative, how could it fail to be anything less than one of
Hollywood's greatest achievements?
© James Travers 2008
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Next John Huston film:
In This Our Life (1942)