Film Review
Andrey Tarkovskiy's fifth film is his most challenging but also his
most visionary masterpiece, an autobiographical poem that presents the
fractured consciousness of a man who is slowly dying and who attempts
to make sense of his existence through a bewildering collage of
disconnected memories. In more ways than one,
The Mirror is to the art of cinema
what Marcel Proust's
À la
recherche du temps perdu is to the literary novel; it propels us
on a similar journey of introspection through the interlocking crevices
of time and memory, compels us to reflect deeply on the significance
and value of existence, but it does so with far greater economy and in
a way that is perhaps easier to engage with. Whilst it has nothing like
the depth and coherence of Proust's novel, Tarkovskiy's film has
greater immediacy and impact; once you have accepted its heretical denial
of structure, it grips you like no other film. What takes
Proust seven substantial volumes of dense, beautifully composed text to
achieve Tarkovskiy's
The Mirror
accomplishes in less than two hours of cinema. We may not be able
to make sense of more than a fraction of what it shows us, yet somehow
the collection of seemingly unrelated images, fragments of a mind that
is unravelling in the face of death, has a potent and enduring
resonance when taken as a whole. It is a film that is both
impenetrable and beguiling, a film that will haunt you forever once you
have seen it and opened your consciousness to its exquisite mystique
and poetry.
The film intercuts memories from Tarkovskiy's own life - his childhood
and adult life - with snatches of newsreel footage which both identify
the significant phases of the author's life (before, during and after
WWII) and suggest the impact that external events have on an individual
in the course of his life. A person's experiences are, after all,
shaped by what is happening in the world around him, even events that
are taking place a long way from home. Dialogue is sparse and
most of the soundtrack consists of poems written by the director's
father, Arseny Tarkovsky, poems that have a strange harmony with the
images that accompany them. Much of the focus of the film is
taken by Tarkovskiy's ambiguous relationship with his mother and wife,
who are, tellingly, played by the same woman (Margarita Terekhova),
except in the one sequence in which Tarkovskiy's own mother plays the
older mother. To anyone who has read Freud, the mother-wife
substitution is easily understood, but this is mirrored by a more
enigmatic fusion of identity, that of the author's son with himself as
a young boy. At times, it is hard to tell who is who, and
this is clearly deliberate. Is this because the author, knowing
he is dying, is attempting to merge his own soul with that of his son,
to cheat death through a process of willed transmigration?
Or is it merely an attempt to seek solace in the fact that his life
will continue after his death through his son's existence, an existence
that will be richer and more meaningful through the experiences that he
has passed on to it? In either case, it is natural for a
man to pursue the spectre of immortality when finally confronted with
the terror of extinction.
The Mirror is a film that has
to be watched several times to appreciate just what a truly remarkable
piece of art it is. On a first viewing, the spectator is
presented with an almost insuperable challenge, torn between
conventional notions of what a film should be and the uncomforting
alternative that Andrey Tarkovskiy offers. This tension makes it
difficult to engage fully with the film and merely adds to the
confusion and sense of alienation. It takes
at least two viewings to come to
grips with this film and see what an extraordinary and unique piece of
art it represents.
The
Mirror is a film that feels like a total reinvention of the art
of cinema, something that would have emerged naturally if the moving
image had gone down a totally different path to the one that was
selected in our world. Gone are all the rigid conventions that
have made cinema the most sterile and predictable of art forms.
In their place is a radically different vision of what cinema could be
if only we, the audience, were more demanding and filmmakers were more
courageous. It is a tragedy that, since Tarkovsky's death, cinema
has gone even further down the road towards soulless homogeneity.
There are fewer surprises, fewer filmmakers with the inclination and
resources to step off the well-worn highway to a mined-out creative
cul-de-sac and instead take us into other, more vital and meaningful
realms of the imagination. More than any other film since the
Second World War,
The Mirror
shows what is possible, how much more we have yet to discover in film
art. Tarkovsky was a prophet and through
The Mirror, his greatest film, we
are given the merest glimpse of just how much more powerful, varied and
wondrous the art of cinema can be, if only filmmakers and audiences
were minded to loosen the strings on their straitjackets.
© James Travers 2011
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Film Synopsis
As a middle-aged man lies dying in hospital, he is oblivious to his
present surroundings and seeks refuge in his memories, fractured
imprints of a life that is rapidly nearing its end. He recalls
his mother and his wife, the two people who have had the greatest
impact on him. He remembers his childhood, his son, his
experiences during the war. It is a confused maelstrom of
seemingly random recollections, like splinters of a broken mirror,
but gradually the pieces begin to come together and in their reflection
the dying man begins to see the worth of the life he has lived...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.