Film Review
One of the evergreen favourites of British cinema,
Zulu continues to impress and
enthral with its stunning recreation of a remarkable military
engagement of the David and Goliath variety. This is the film
that set Michael Caine on the road to stardom, even though the actor
completely botched his screen test and expected to be replaced even
after filming had commenced. Heading the cast of superlative
character actors is Stanley Baker, who co-produced the film with
director Cy Endfield. The latter made the film during his exile
in Britain, after having been blacklisted in Hollywood for alleged
involvement in Communist activities.
Zulu was the one major achievement
of Endfield's career, and what an achievement.
Michael Caine's acting ability proved to be the least of Endfield's
worries when he began shooting the location sequences in Africa.
The real worry was getting the Zulus extras to act as convincing
warriors. None of the Zulus had ever seen a movie and just
couldn't work out what they were being asked to do. In the end,
Endfield resorted to showing them an old Gene Autry western, and that
seemed to do the trick. The battle sequences in
Zulu are amongst the most horrific
of any war film, made all the more effective by the sharp editing and
John Barry's tension-building score.
One of the main strengths of
Zulu
is its deliberate lack of bias. Most films of this kind have us
rooting for one side or the other (usually it's the white,
English-speaking side). Here, we are led to sympathise with both
sides in the conflict. We are equally sickened by the killing of
Zulu warriors and British soldiers alike - both represent the pointless
extinction of a human life. Whilst not overtly an anti-war film,
Zulu makes no bones about the fact
that war is an ugly business and is not something that we should ever
seek to glorify for its own sake. In 1979, a prequel to this film was
released,
Zulu Dawn, although this proved to be nowhere near as
successful as the original.
© James Travers 2009
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Film Synopsis
In 1879, missionary Otto Witt and his daughter Margareta are attending
a mass Zulu marriage ceremony in Natal when they learn that a British
force of 1400 men has just been wiped out by an army of Zulu
warriors. Realising that similar such battles may be imminent,
Witt returns to the missionary station at Rorke's Drift and advises an
immediate evacuation. The British officer in charge of this
outpost, Lieutenant Gonville Bromhead, is ready to retreat but he is
overruled by his superior, Lieutenant John Chard, an officer in the
Royal Engineers who had been overseeing the construction of a
bridge. Fearing that his men would be picked off if they
attempted to flee, Chard gives the order for the soldiers to stay and
fight. It isn't long before the Zulus make their
appearance. They are easily repelled but it is apparent that this
first attack is intended merely to test the strength of their
opponents. Sure enough, the Zulus return in force a short
time later, armed with rifles they acquired in their recent battle
against the British. It soon looks as if Witt's prediction that
every last man in the station will die is about to come true. How
can a contingent of one hundred soldiers hope to survive an onslaught
from an army of 4000 Zulu warriors?
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.