Film Review
Judging by his previous four features, Joachim Lafosse appears to be an
artist who is naturally drawn to the darker, more twisted aspects of
human experience, often within the stifling confines of the
dysfunctional family. In his latest film, the 37-year-old Belgian
filmmaker serves up more of the same as he recounts the events which
lead a seemingly ordinary, well-adjusted woman to murder her four young
children. Inspired by a real-life multiple infanticide
committed by a Belgian mother, Geneviève Lhermitte, in 2007,
À perdre la raison (a.k.a.
Our Children) sets out to convince
us that the most unthinkable of crimes can naturally arise from the
most ordinary of circumstances, and in the safest of environments.
À perdre la raison is
every bit as delicately crafted and unsettling as Lafosse's previous
portrayals of domestic disharmony -
Nue propriété
(2006) and
Élève libre
(2008) - and just as provocative. Lafosse has no interest in
passing judgement on what is, in most people's book, the most heinous
of domestic crimes, but nor does he seek to exculpate the killer.
Instead he takes a completely neutral standpoint and invites us to do
the same, so that we may begin to understand how such unspeakable
horrors can arise within what appears to be the most benign of
settings. In spite of what the tabloid newspapers would have us
believe, most murders that take place within the home are not committed
by born monsters, but by ordinary people in a moment of madness.
We like to think the world is made up of good and bad people, but this
is merely a comforting delusion. The truth is far more complex.
Lafosse is wise to tell the story from the perspective of the central
character, Murielle. This gives the film its focus and forces us
to identify with an individual who, once her crime has been splashed
all over the newspapers, will undoubtedly be branded a monster.
Murielle is anything but a monster. When we first see her, she
appears to be the victim of some unimaginable personal tragedy.
Lying in bed in hospital, she is obsessed with a single idea, that her
children be buried in Morocco. We see four small white coffins
being loaded aboard a plane. And then there is the extended
flashback which shows how this tragic endpoint was arrived at.
The story begins as though it were a fairytale, with Murielle, full of
life and happiness, marrying the man she loves. There is no hint
of the disaster that is to come, and it is hard to imagine how Murielle
could in any way be responsible for the death of her four
children. The most disturbing aspect of the journey that Lafosse
takes us on as we accompany Murielle on her descent into Hell is its
mundanity - it is something that could happen to anyone.
Emilie Dequenne has come a long way since her remarkable debut in the
Dardennes brothers'
Rosetta (1999). Now,
perfectly chosen to play the lead in Lafosse's darkest film to date,
she delivers what is undoubtedly her finest performance, one of
extraordinary power and subtlety. Dequenne compels sympathy as we
witness Murielle's imperceptibly slow descent into depression, a
decline caused not by neglect or material need but by a hopeless sense
of entrapment in a world that offers her no possibility for escape or
development. It is not cruelty that robs Murielle of her zest for
living and transforms her into a modern Medea, it is the fact that she
has allowed herself to become trapped in a non-existence of
life-sapping sterility. Depression is one of the hardest things
that an actor can play convincingly, but Dequenne does an admirable job
and it is hard not be moved by her harrowing portrayal of a young
mother slowly drowning in a sea of desolation. She was justly
honoured with the Best Actress award when the film premiered in the Un
Certain Regard section of the Cannes Film Festival in 2012.
In a near-reprise of their close father-son relationship in Jacques
Audiard's
Un prophète (2009),
Niels Arestrup and Tahar Rahim supply the film's other two gripping
performances. It is the unbreakable bond between their two
characters that is the central unresolved mystery of the film, and the
thing that triggers the tragic outcome. Of the three main
characters, Arestrup's Dr Pinget is the most ambiguous and the most
disturbing. When we first see him, he appears to be the model
altruist, a man who dedicates his life to helping his fellow man and
expects nothing in return. He has a marriage of convenience with
a poor Moroccan woman so that he can adopt her young son Mounir and
give him the life he could never have hoped to have otherwise.
But are Pinget's motives as selfless as they appear? Could there
be a more sinister purpose behind his desire to adopt an attractive
young Moroccan boy?
Mounir's tie to his benefactor is as unfathomable as the latter's
willingness to give him everything he asks for. Naturally Mounir
should feel grateful for Pinget's kindness, but is gratitude alone the
reason for his filial devotion? Perhaps we should see a
parallel in the slightly sinister relationship between a teacher and
his pupil in Joachim's previous film
Élève
libre, a relationship with a distinct hint of paedophilia about
it. As the film develops, it becomes apparent that Pinget needs
Mournir and Murielle as much as they need him. Like a vampire, he
feeds vicariously on their conjugal life, the life he could never have
for himself. It is as if they are playthings to him, and you can
imagine he delights in the power he has over them. The
near-incestuous arrangement suits the weak, spiritless Mournir, but for
Murielle it spells disaster. Her safe home becomes no more than a
luxuriously furnished prison, in which she is merely a household pet or
a domestic drone. Unable to break free of her dependency on
Pinget and her husband, Murielle loses her own identity and becomes
increasingly isolated. Murielle's emotional and moral collapse is
not sudden; it takes place over several years, a gradual erosion of her
dignity and strength. In the end, suicide is the only way out,
and what could be more natural than for a desperate mother to take her
children with her?
À perdre la raison
feels like a close relation (perhaps an illegitimate child) of a Claude
Chabrol film. As in Chabrol's better films (for example,
La
Cérémonie, 1995), we cannot help but have a
sense of something extremely nasty gestating beneath a surface of
apparent normality. Like Chabrol, Lafosse underplays the drama
and exploits the ambiguity of his characters to maintain our interest
and heighten the dramatic impact of the film's ending. Lafosse is
not interested in cheap thrills, and he certainly doesn't dwell on the
horrific denouement as a lesser, more sensationalist filmmaker
might. What he demands is that we see beyond the horror of the
crime and appreciate the normality of the circumstances that led up to
it, the slowly corrosive banalities that culminate in Zero Hour.
If we are disturbed by
À
perdre la raison, it is because it challenges the facile notion
that monstrous acts can only be performed by monstrous people.
Whilst it may be comforting to pretend that only bad people do bad
things, the reality is that human nature is far more complicated, and
it is no bad thing that there are filmmakers like Joachim Lafosse to go
on reminding us of this fact.
© James Travers 2012
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.