Film Review
This respectable adaptation of
A
Tale of Two Cities has always been overshadowed by the memorable
1935 film version, starring Ronald Colman, as well as the more recent
David Lean Dickens adaptations,
Great Expectations (1946) and
Olivier
Twist (1948). Although it may lack the sublime
artistry and passion of these other great Dickens adaptations, it is an
engaging piece which retells the well-known story of revolution,
unrequited love and self-sacrifice with understated poignancy.
The main selling points are Dirk Bogarde's sombre yet humane portrayal
of a man desperately looking for meaning in his life and its authentic
recreation of revolutionary France.
The film was made by the same team that brought us the popular
Doctor films which had made
Dirk Bogarde a household name in the 1950s - producer Betty Box and
director Ralph Thomas. Whilst Thomas is clearly not in the league
of David Lean, some of his work does bear favourable comparison with
his more illustrious contemporary, and his
A Tale of Two Cities is arguably
one such film. The film may lack focus and intensity,
particularly in its dawdling first half, but it production values are
as impressive as any other British film of this period.
The stark black and white photography and frequent switches between
sedate London and turbulent Paris emphasise the dual nature of the
Carlton / Darnay persona - two characters linked by a tragic destiny
who are in fact two faces of the same coin. It is a pity
that these two characters were not both played by the same actor (this
could have been achieved using split-screen photography), particularly
as the two actors that were chosen - Dirk Bogarde and Paul Guers - do
not even bear a passing resemblance to one another.
Another weak point is Dorothy Tutin's lacklustre performance, although
this is adequately compensated by some arresting character
contributions from Donald Pleasence, Alfie Bass and Rosalie Crutchley
(who all appear to be on a day release from a lunatic asylum).
Christopher Lee also puts in a notable turn as a deliciously nasty
aristo, his last supporting role before he appeared in Hammer's
Dracula
(1958), the film that made him an icon of the horror genre.
This may not be cinema's finest Dickens adaptation, but it captures the
essence of the original novel admirably, thanks to a fine performance
from Bogarde, some atmospheric cinematography and an inspired staging
of the story's tragic climax.
© James Travers 2009
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Film Synopsis
In 1775, the banker Jarvis Lorry travels to Paris to be reunited with
his old friend, Dr Alexandre Manette, who has been held prisoner in the
Bastille for the last eighteen years. Dr Manette is revived from
his near-catatonic state when he sets eyes on his daughter Lucie and
the pair leave for England to start a new life together.
Five years later, Lucie's beau, the Frenchman Charles Darnay, is being
tried at the Old Bailey for treason. His is acquitted
through the efforts of his defence lawyer, Sydney Carlton, who exploits
his striking likeness to Darnay to demolish the witness testimony
against him. Darnay is in truth the nephew of the Marquis St.
Evrémonde, a sadistic aristocrat who abuses his servants and
treats peasants like animals. The Marquis is loathed by many and
ends up being murdered by the father of a boy he ran over in his
coach. Meanwhile, Darnay and Lucie have married, to the
distress of Carlton, who realises that Lucie is the only woman he can
ever love. In July 1789, with France in the grips of a bloody
revolution, Darnay receives an urgent request from one of his former
servants to come to his aid. No sooner has Darnay arrived in
Paris than he is arrested and imprisoned. Identified as a
relation of the reviled Marquis St. Evrémonde, Darany is tried
and condemned to death by guillotine. To save Darany and ensure
the future happiness of the woman he loves, Carlton takes his place on
the scaffold.
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.