Film Review
Fangs are definitely not what they used to be. Mel Brooks' second
horror spoof is another irreverent foray into classic Gothic territory,
an exuberant oddball farce that does to the classic Bram Stoker tale
what the director had previously done to Mary Shelley's novel in his
rip-roaring
Young Frankenstein
(1974). A few years prior to this, Francis Ford Coppola had
offered his own take on the vampiric legend, the shamelessly mis-titled
Bram
Stoker's Dracula (1992), so it is hardly a surprise that
Brooks pokes fun at this film, whilst also paying a semi-disrespectful
homage to previous Dracula movies from the Universal and Hammer
stable. On its first release, the film was almost universally
panned, although today it is much easier to sit through than Coppola's
unbearably pretentious Dracula monstrosity.
Dracula: Dead and Loving It is far
from being Mel Brooks' greatest film but it is a slick production that
delivers a fair quota of laughs, albeit nothing on the seismic scale of
Young Frankenstein.
Whilst the lavish baroque sets and lush cinematography owe more to
Hammer's Gothic horror productions of the late 1950s and early 1960s,
the plot is obviously a reworking of Universal's classic
Dracula
(1931), and it helps to have recently seen that film beforehand
(otherwise you'll miss all the best gags). Leslie Nielsen is a
dead-ringer for Bela Lugosi, mimicking Lugosi's facial expressions and
thick Hungarian accent so perfectly you'd think they were related
(blood brothers maybe?). Peter MacNicol's crazed Renfield
instantly calls to mind Dwight Frye's hysterical portrayal in
Universal's film whilst Mel Brooks offers up a magnificent parody of
Edward Van Sloan's Van Helsing. The references to Coppola's
Dracula film are far less respectful, including Renfield and Harker
being groped by lustful she-vampires and a grotesque colour saturated
dream sequence that will have you reaching for your dark glasses.
The comic high point is the scene in which Harker drives a stake
through Lucy's heart and is drenched in a shower of blood - Brooks
omitted to tell Steven Weber how much theatrical blood would be blown
up into his face, hence his reaction is one of genuine surprise (and
one of the funniest things you will ever see). The jokes may not
come as easily as in previous Mel Brooks films, and some are downright
puerile, but overall
Dracula: Dead
and Loving It is an enjoyable family friendly romp - a welcome
antidote to Coppola's vampire monstrosity and a wickedly
tongue-in-cheek homage to the many great Dracula films that preceded
it.
© James Travers 2011
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Next Mel Brooks film:
The Producers (1968)
Film Synopsis
In the 1890s, estate agent Thomas Renfield undertakes the long and
hazardous journey from London to Transylvania to conclude the sale of
Carfax Abbey to a certain Count Dracula. Little does he know that
Dracula is a vampire whose move to England is motivated more by an
appetite for fresh blood than cultural advancement. With Renfield
his willing slave, Dracula crosses land and sea and is soon happily
settled in London. Whilst Dr Seward, the owner of an asylum, is
preoccupied with the insane insect-eating Renfield, his ward Lucy falls
under the spell of Dracula. Perplexed by Lucy's mysterious
loss of blood, Seward calls in Dr Van Helsing, an authority on rare
diseases. Van Helsing declares that Lucy is the victim of a
vampire and insists that her bedroom be strewn with garlic to keep the
fiend away. Dracula proves to be a more formidable enemy than Van
Helsing realises. Having transformed Lucy into one of his own
kind, Dracula turns his attention to Seward's daughter Mina. Who
says the living have all the fun...?
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.