Film Review
After a six-year long hiatus, during which United Artists and Danjaq
(the owners of EON Productions) were locked in a seemingly intractable
legal wrangle, the James Bond movies finally made it into the 1990s,
with an action-packed extravaganza which was to provide the template
for the series over the next decade. Timothy Dalton had given up
the part after two films (one of which had been a near-flop in the
United States) and 42-year-old Pierce Brosnan stepped into the role as
though it had been custom-made for him. Although critical opinion
was divided,
GoldenEye proved
to be a huge commercial hit and ensured that the Bond franchise would
thrive into the new millennium.
As a straightforward action adventure,
GoldenEye is a respectable offering
for its time, although it sacrifices character depth in favour of
wham-bam action spectacle and is one of the most superficial of the
Bond movies. After a concerted effort by the previous production
team to move away from the innuendo-based silliness of the Roger Moore
years and make a Bond a more believable and human character, the team
on
GoldenEye reverted to the
old formula that had proved far more popular, which meant more gadgets,
gimmickry and an endless stream of puerile gags about sex.
GoldenEye probably owes much of its
success to the fact that it plays the nostalgia card with shameless
abandon and on several occasions it feels like a crude pastiche of the
Roger Moore Bond films. The film is significant in that it is the
first in the series not to use any elements from the Ian Fleming novels
(other than Bond and his secret service associates).
In his debut outing, Brosnan looks more comfortable in the part of Bond
than his predecessor ever did, although his characterisation lacks
substance and at times he looks like a synthetic copy of Moore (albeit
somewhat rejuvenated). Perhaps the most likeable portrayal to
date, Brosnan's Bond is charming and heroic, but is more comic-book
superhero than the flawed hero that Timothy Dalton attempted to bring
to his interpretation of the part. Judi Dench is inspired casting
for the part of M and Sean Bean makes a surprisingly effective villain
(although you could argue the film might have been much more
interesting if Brosnan and Bean had switched roles). The script
offers little opportunity for character development, but the cast make
the best of what they are given and there is hardly a dull moment. Whilst the film is somewhat
shallow and prone to silliness in parts, it is an entertaining non-stop
rollercoaster - the best re-launch the series could have hoped for at a
time when, with the Cold War consigned to history, Bond was looking decidedly out-dated.
© James Travers 2011
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Film Synopsis
British agent James Bond is sent to Monte Carlo to tail Xenia Onatopp,
a member of the mysterious Janus crime syndicate. Bond fails to
prevent Onatopp and her associate General Ourumov from stealing a
revolutionary new helicopter which is capable of withstanding an
electromagnetic pulse. Onatopp and Ourumov take the helicopter to
a secret Russian research base at Severnaya where, having slaughtered
the staff, they steal the control disks for a satellite weapon named
GoldenEye. Bond's mission takes him to St Petersburg, where he
learns that Janus is a former associate of his, Alec Trevelyan, who has
turned traitor to avenge the West's betrayal of his parents at the end
of WWII. Trevelyan intends to use GoldenEye to destroy the West's
computer systems, thereby inflicting a catastrophic financial
meltdown...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.