Film Review
Once the realisation had hit home that the public had had its fill of
Gothic horror and there wasn't must mileage left in the genre, Hammer's
reaction was to suddenly (and somewhat belatedly) diversify into other
areas of horror, aware that strong competition was heading its way from
across the pond. The early 1970s was arguably Hammer's most
creative period, a new intake of talented young writers and directors
feeding the company's need to move with the times and give the low
budget horror movie a new lease of life. One of the more daring
and innovative of these newcomers was the Hungarian born filmmaker
Peter Sasdy, whose art house spectaculars
Taste the Blood of Dracula
(1969) and
Countess Dracula (1971), gave
the studio's run of vampire films a badly needed shot in the arm just
when it was starting to become an embarrassment.
Sasdy's third feature for Hammer is far less well-known but it is
assuredly his best work for the company, if not one of the best horror
films Hammer made in its declining years.
Hands of the Ripper is a lush
period piece which appeals as much to the eye as it does to the
intellect, with enough buckets of gore and full-on slasher nastiness to
satisfy the more primal appetites of Hammer's less artistically minded
clientele. It makes the perfect companion-piece to Hammer's
Dr. Jekyll and Sister Hyde
(1971), both being intelligently scripted films inspired by the Jack
the Ripper case, set in a London of the late Victorian era that we at
once recognise from the tales of Sherlock Holmes. Both films
serve up plenty of gory shocks, but whereas
Dr. Jekyll and Sister Hyde opts for
a distinctly comedic slant,
Hands of
the Ripper plays it deadly seriously, as grim as the grimmest
of Jacobean tragedies.
That this is a superior Hammer horror offering is evident as much from
its prestigious cast as it is from its astonishing production
values. Eric Porter takes the role that would ordinarily have
gone to Peter Cushing, the well-meaning scientist who believes he can
cure a killer's daughter of her condition by kindness and
understanding. Porter was famous at the time for his role in the
television serial
The Forsyte Saga (1967), a
starchy Victorian who acquires his humanity through a succession of
misfortunes. His character in
Hands
of the Ripper follows a similar trajectory, albeit one that is
nearer to Grand Guignol than drawing room melodrama, and one of the
reasons why the film works so well is because Dr Pritchard is someone
we can readily relate to, a flawed human being who is brought down by
his own bloody-minded munificence.
And then there's the stunning Angharad Rees, remarkable in one of her
first screen roles as the seemingly possessed Anna. Rees would
later become familiar to British audiences as Demelza in the television
series
Poldark (1975-1977)
but here her star potential is already apparent, a picture of divine
innocence in some scenes, a demonic fury in others. Jane Merrow,
Keith Bell and Derek Godfrey add further lustre to the production,
their characters having far more depth than you might expect in a
Hammer horror film, and there's some fun to be had from Dora Bryan and
Lynda Baron's presence before they each meet an unspeakably grisly end.
Even the most devoted admirers of Hammer's horror films would be hard
pressed to suggest many that can genuinely be described as great works
of cinema.
Hands of the Ripper
is one of just a handful that merit this generous epithet, not just
because of its sumptuous visuals and arresting performances, but
because it also makes the effort to tell an emotionally rewarding
good-versus-evil story that does more than just titillate. The
final sequence set in the Whispering Gallery of St Paul's Cathedral is
perhaps the most beautiful of any Hammer horror, one that provides a
breathtakingly elegant conclusion to one of the most stylish British
genre films of the decade.
© James Travers 2015
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Film Synopsis
Anna is no more than a toddler when she witnesses her mother's savage
death at the hands of her father, who is none other than the notorious
serial killer Jack the Ripper. Fifteen years on, she is in the
dubious care of Mrs Golding, a charlatan spiritualist who sells her
services as a prostitute. After hosting a séance, Mrs
Golding is murdered by Anna, the only witness to the killing being Mr
Dysart, an ambitious member of parliament. Rather than hand over
Anna to the authorities, Dr John Pritchard, a progressive scientist,
insists she should stay with him at his home, so that he can study and
perhaps cure her of her homicidal tendencies. Convinced that the
key to understanding Anna's behaviour lies in her past, Pritchard asks
Dysart to look into her background and is shocked to learn that she is
Jack the Ripper's daughter. Under the influence of her long dead
father, Anna is forced to kill again...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.