Film Review
A second wind - for two
In 1946, Jean Gabin's hasty decision to turn down the lead role in the most
prestigious French film of the year,
Les Portes de la nuit,
would have major consequences for not only his own future career but also
that of the film's director, Marcel Carné. Encouraged by his
real-life partner at the time, Marlène Dietrich, Gabin instead opted
to star in
Martin Roumagnac,
a noir-style melodrama directed by Georges Lacombe. The actor's hopes
of an immediate comeback after WWII were dashed in the face of the most fierce
critical onslaught he had ever known. Coming after his failure to make
it big in Hollywood a few years earlier Gabin would have had good reason to
think that his career was in terminal decline. The critical reaction
to his next film
Miroir (1947) was just
as negative although what was more concerning was Gabin's inability to draw
the large audiences he had regularly attracted in the previous decade.
There was no escaping the fact that the postwar Gabin was very different to
what he had been in his glory days of the 1930s. He looked older, appeared
stiffer and tougher, and had acquired some off-putting authoritarian mannerisms
as a result of his wartime experience in the French Marines. He
was still capable of playing the romantic lead - the success of Rene Clément's
Oscar-winning
Au-delà des
grilles (1948) bore this out - but it was clear that by the late 1940s
Jean Gabin needed to move into a very different groove if he was to have
any future as a big name in French cinema.
Coincidentally, the same was true of Marcel Carné, the director who
had contributed much to Gabin's pre-war success with his poetic realist masterpieces
Le Quai des brumes (1938)
and
Le Jour se lève
(1939). In the mid-1940s, Carné was one of France's most highly
esteemed filmmakers, but by the close of 1946 both the critics and the film
industry had turned against him, so intensely hostile had been the reaction
to his provocative and inordinately expensive
Les Portes de la nuit.
In common with many directors who had chosen to remain in France during the
Occupation, Carné had become tainted with the slur of collaboration,
thanks to his brief stint with the German-run company Continental Films.
In 1946, the French people wanted to forget what they had experienced during
the dark years under Nazi Occupation but Carné's grimly unpatriotic
film, with its overt references to collaborators, kept alive the memories
that the nation was eager to bury. For the next three years, the
man who had helmed two of the most acclaimed French films made during WWII
-
Les Visiteurs du soir
(1942) and
Les Enfants du paradis
(1945) - was unable to get a single project off the ground. Attempts
to adapt Franz Kafka's
The Castle and Voltaire's
Candide came
to nothing, and the one film that did make it into production,
La Fleur
de l'âge, was aborted after a few days' filming when the financial
backers suddenly pulled out. Carné desperately wanted to make
Juliette ou la Clef des Songes, a film he had originally attempted
(unsuccessfully) a few years earlier, but it was such an ambitious undertaking
that it had little chance of seeing the light of day - until the independent
producer Sacha Gordine stepped in. Gordine was sold on the idea but
considered it a highly risky venture. He made a deal with Carné,
promising to finance the film on condition that he first delivered a box office
success with a much more modest budget. This was a decisive moment
in Carné's career and, as luck would have it, for Jean Gabin as well.
The film that Marcel Carné agreed to direct for Gordine was
La
Marie du port, an adaptation of a 1938 novel by Georges Simenon of the
same title. To maximise the chance of the film's success, Carné
persuaded Gabin to take the lead role, confident that the actor was on the
brink of a big comeback after his recent screen success (Clément's
film) and triumph on the Paris stage in a critically acclaimed production
of Henri Bernstein's play
La Soif. The film was hardly a runaway
success (its audience of 2.7 million appears modest compared with the 6.7
million achieved by the year's biggest hit
Nous irons à Paris)
but, thanks to its modest production budget, it made enough money for Gordine
to honour his pledge to allow Carné to realise his dream project,
Juliette
ou la Clef des Songes (which sadly proved to be somewhat less successful).
The challenge of making a relatively low budget film within a fairly quick
production schedule was, however, highly beneficial for a director whose
natural tendency for obsessive perfectionism and wild extravagance needed
to be tamed if he was ever to regain the confidence of an increasingly profit-conscious
film industry. After the grandiose excesses of Carné's previous
three films, the low-key
La Marie du port came as something of a surprise
to everyone - albeit one to which most critics responded favourably.
Metamorphosis
There's no doubt that
La Marie du port is a comparatively minor entry
in the filmographies of both Marcel Carné and Jean Gabin, but it is
equally true that for both men it was an absolutely crucial film, allowing
them to transition to what they would become in the second half of their respective
careers. For Gabin, now in his mid-forties (but looking somewhat older),
the film gave him the opportunity to create a new screen persona that was drastically
different from that of his prewar years but fitted perfectly with his tougher
postwar physique and personality. Gone was all trace of the heroic
working class romantic hero - this was now a complete anachronism that had
no place in 1950s France. Instead, Gabin fashions himself as the epitome
of the bourgeois patriarch, a man of means who appears in control not only of
his own destiny but also that of lesser mortals who fall under his power
- in short, a godfather figure. (Indeed, it is the actor's gangster
portrayals, in such films as Jacques Becker's classic
Touchez pas au grisbi (1954),
that are the most memorable in his later years).
La Marie du port's
crowd-baiting 'gimmick' of romantically pairing the older Gabin with a much
younger nubile ingénue would be repeated many times over the course
of the following decade, other notable examples being Jean Renoir's
French Cancan (1954) (with Françoise
Arnoul) and Claude Autant-Lara's
En
cas de malheur (1955) (with Brigitte Bardot).
The change in Marcel Carné's cinema was no less dramatic than the
transformation in Gabin's screen persona. The poetic realism of the
1930s was gone, replaced by a commitment to a new form of authentic expression
- psychological realism within the context of contemporary themes that were
of greatest relevance to a post-WWII French cinema audience. The humiliation
of the capitulation at the start of the Second World War and the long period
of Occupation that followed cast a long shadow over France, making it easy
for the country to embrace the dramatic social and political changes that
came after the war. By the late 1940s, after a few years of gruelling
austerity, France was entering a brave new era defined by ever-increasing
individualism and materialistic self-interest. Social cohesion was breaking
down and, as it did so, the old illusions, the old romantic dreams, faded
from view. Released in February 1950,
La Marie du port was perfectly
suited to its time and with it Carné made a clear statement that he
was back with a new kind of
cinéma populiste - one that dealt
not with people's dreams but with their practical concerns for the rapidly
changing world they were now living in.
The darkly oppressive look and feel of Carné's great 1930s melodramas
(which owed much to German expressionism of the previous decade) is almost
entirely absent in
La Marie du port, which makes much greater use of
real location exteriors and has most of its action take place during the daylight
hours. It is only in the few night-time sequences - where the young
lovers Marie and Marcel meet on a studio reconstruction of the Port-en-Bessin
harbour (another marvel from the legendary designer Alexandre Trauner) that
the film has any connection with Carné's poetic realist films, but
in a way that is clearly intended to be cruelly ironic. The apparent
artificiality of the set is emphasised by the starkly expressionistic way
in which it is lit and photographed, and this exposes the risibly artificial
nature of the young lovers' romance as a dream without any substance.
As we see later in the film, Marcel's supposed romantic idealism is scarcely
paper-thin and Marie is far more interested in social and material advancement
than true love. For the most part,
La Marie de port conforms
with the new realist style of French cinema that followed on from Italian
neo-realism of the 1940s, a style that became
quite commonplace in contemporary French film drama
for a few years after the success of René
Clément's
Au-delà des grilles. Combining social
realism and melodrama, such films would often be situated in provincial settings
and revolve around the everyday lives of ordinary working class people.
Other examples include Henri Calef's
La Maison sous la mer (1947)
and Marcello Pagliero's
Un homme marche dans la
ville (1949). Carné's film benefits from extensive location
filming in Cherbourg and the nearby smaller coastal town of Port-en-Bessin
(undertaken by Henri Alekan, one of the era's most gifted cinematographers).
This not only lends the film a striking positive modernity but also a visual
poetry that is of a very different kind to what we find in the director's
earlier films - more wistful than tragic.
In accounting for
La Marie du port's significant departure from Carné's
previous films much has been made of the fact that it was the director's first
film after he brought to an end his long and fruitful collaboration with
the screenwriter Jacques Prévert. There is no mention of Prévert
in the film's credits and the writer himself denied having had any substantial
input into the film, and yet Carné maintained that the script was
predominantly Prévert's work. The film's dialogue is in fact
credited to another distinguished writer, the Dadist poet Georges Ribemont-Dessaignes,
his one and only feature film credit. The truth was that Prévert
did in fact do the lion's share of the work on the script but he was unable
to take the credit as this risked him breaching the terms of an invalidity
pension he was drawing at the time after he had suffered a serious accident
which (he claimed) prevented him from undertaking paid work.
La
Marie du port was Prévert's final collaboration with Carné,
bringing to an end a turbulent but incredibly productive association that
began almost fifteen years earlier with Carné's first feature,
Jenny (1936).
Escape to captivity
Perhaps
La Marie du port's most tangible point of contact with Carné's
earlier films is the shared desire by each of the four protagonists to escape
their present constraining existences and pursue their (obviously unrealistic)
dreams elsewhere. This is most apparent in the case of Marie, the younger
sister who is trapped in a life of drudgery as a café waitress and
wants nothing more than to flee to Paris and find herself a rich eligible
bachelor. A half-hearted love affair with a good-looking youth in her
own neighbourhood (Marcel) is clearly not enough for her, even if he treats
her to occasional gifts of expensive perfume (obtained at immense personal
sacrifice to himself). How she envies her older sister Odile, not knowing
that that the latter is just as dissatisfied with her lot, having failed to
realise her own dreams of escape with her rich boyfriend Henri. Marie
is the only character in the film who gets what she thinks she wants, selling
herself so that she can move a few rungs up the social ladder.
Henri is, on the face of it, a man who has no need of dreams. A successful
entrepreneur, he has just about everything a man could want and has no difficulty
attracting the fair sex. And yet even he has a hankering after freedom.
Early in the film he is seen looking out through the window of Marie's café
at a passing funeral procession. From the street, framed by the window,
he looks like an unhappy prisoner trapped behind bars. It's an almost
exact reproduction of a similar shot in
Le Quai des brumes, with the
same actor (Gabin) seen through a window beside Michèle Morgan.
In that earlier film, the shot stresses the fatalistic entrapment of the two
characters, who are fated never to escape from their miserable predicament.
The virtually identical shot in
La Marie du port assures us that Gabin,
in his latest guise, is just as constrained by his narrow bourgeois mentality.
He is doomed - not to suffer a grisly premature death, but to live out the
rest of days in the burdensome chains of matrimony as the respectable middleclass
married man. His dreams of escape are apparent when his gaze is drawn
to scenes of a far-away island paradise in a screening of Murnau's
Tabu in his own
cinema. His impulsive decision to buy a fishing boat says just as much.
Inevitably, Henri is fated to give up his dreams of being a free man as he
surrenders to the prison of bourgeois conformity - a point that is eloquently
expressed in a metaphorical shot towards the end of the film. After
the fateful telephone call that alerts the brasserie owner to the fact that
Marie's life may be in danger, the camera fixes on the door of the phone cubicle
as it slowly but inexorably closes. By now, Henri's fate is set in
stone. There is no possibility of escape as he rushes towards the marital
snare that has been laid for him by his cunning temptress. His prison
door is slowly but surely closing on him.
As for Marcel, the poor working class boy with an impoverished sot of a
father, his romantic idealism is soon exposed as a hollow charade - first
with a ludicrously feeble attempt at self-harm and then with the ease with
which he allows himelf to be seduced by Odile (not that we can blame him
given that Odile is played by such an alluring actress as Blanchette Brunoy).
The fact that this dreamy romantic with clay feet is named Marcel may be significant:
could the director possibly be using the character to mock his earlier, more
romantically inclined self? It is tempting to liken Marcel with the
principal character (played by Gérard Philipe) in Georges Lampin's
L'Idiot (1946), a film that is directly
referenced in
La Marie du port and (tellingly) ridiculed by Gabin's
character. Underlying Marcel's apparent naivety are unattractive qualities
(selfishness, vindictiveness, impetuosity) that set him well apart from the
young romantics of Carné's early films and place him among the wilder
youths of the director's later films -
Les
Tricheurs (1959),
Terrain vague
(1960),
Les Jeunes loups
(1968). Interestingly, the actor that Carné chose for the role
was Claude Romain, who was to have had his screen debut in the director's
previous (abandoned)
La Fleur de l'âge. Romain appeared
in just three films after this, his last screen credit being in Georges Lacombe's
La Lumière d'en face
(1955). En passant, it is worth mentioning two other notable names in
the cast list - Julien Carette, a popular supporting actor favoured by Jean
Renoir (
La Règle du jeu)
and Claude Autant-Lara (
L'Auberge
rouge), and Jane Marken who, as a café owner, appears in a
role virtually identical to the one she had played in Carné's
Hôtel du nord (1938).
Whilst none of the four main characters is particularly sympathetic, the
film tacitly avoids casting judgement on them. This is a feature of
all of Carné's postwar films, which adopt an even greater degree of
objectivity and detachment than we find in his earlier work. This runs
counter to the trend in French cinema of the period 1946 to 1955 in which
female protagonists are often shown in a negative light (a hangover of the
prevailing chauvinistic view that during the Occupation most of the collaborators
had been women). Consider for example, Julien Duvivier's
Voici le temps des assassins
(1956), which has a similar plot to
La Marie du port except that the
lead female character (played by Danièle Delorme) is presented as
a heartless monster driven by greedy self-interest. By contrast, Marie
in Carné's film is a much more ambiguous and engaging character, which
is due in part to a remarkably nuanced performance from Nicole Courcel (excelling
in what was only her second screen role, following her debut in Jacques Becker's
Rendez-vous de juillet
(1949)). In one key scene, where Henri is struggling to get inside
the girl's head, Marie's implacable face is captured in a massive close-up
that shows us nothing about the character's true nature. Only in a
few brief shots does the character betray her intention of hooking Henri and
forcing him into a marriage that will allow her to realise her ambitions.
For the most part, Marie appears as Henri sees her - a beguiling enigma, the
most inscrutable and irresistible of honey traps.
How right Henri is when he quips (in jest) that Marie is a siren.
Once he has fallen under her spell (which happens within a few seconds of
their first meeting), he is a man trapped for life.
Equally apt is the girl's description as
sournoise,
someone who hides her thoughts and true feelings,
a quality that leads Henri to rap his knuckles on her forehead as if in a desperate
attempt to get at what is in her head. It is possible to view Marie
as a scheming opportunist (like Delorme's brazenly evil character in Duvivier's
film), skilfully manipulating an older man into marrying her so that she
can secure a better life for herself. But we can also see her as a
shining example of the modern liberated woman, one who uses the one asset
she has - her obvious sex appeal - so that she can move up the social hierarchy.
In her determination and assertiveness, Marie bears some resemblance to Simone
Signoret's character in the director's subsequent
Thérèse Raquin (1953).
She may not be the kind of 'perfect being' that Carné was fixated
on in his 1930s films, but neither is she in any sense a villain. In
fact, by the end of the film we know her well enough to realise that the
apparent triumph she shows in the closing shot will be short-lived.
For an idea of what her future prospects hold we have only to watch Carné's
next contemporary realist drama
L'Air
de Paris (1954), which presents the unvarnished truth of married life
with Gabin grumpily saddled with a doormat wife he habitually neglects and
abuses.
Always look on the dark side of life
The crushing pessimism of Carné's prewar films lies in the fact that
his characters are manifestly unable to escape their tragic destinies - not
because they are weak or ineffectual but because their lives are governed
by powerful external forces that are beyond their control. The director's
postwar films offer another kind of pessimism that reflects the experience
of ordinary people living in a less superstitious, far less ideologically
driven age. Here, his characters may have greater freedom but this
freedom does not guarantee happiness. On the contrary, it is just another
way in which misery can be self-inflicted, through freely made choices that
do not have the expected or desired outcomes. In contast to Carné's
work of the 1930s, his later films appear to be more in line with the existentialist
notion that men (and women) are condemned not by the Fates but by their own
wilfully driven actions. 'If we are unhappy it is because we choose
to be unhappy' is one interpretation of Sartrean freedom Whatever its
origins, there's no mistaking the deep stream of pessimism that runs through
practically all of Carné's work. The grasping for the unattainable
is what appears to motivate most of his protagonists - the inevitable fate
of beings of unbounded imagination that are forced to inhabit a world of
finite possibilities. The truth of this would hit the director incredibly
hard as he embarked on his next ambitious film project - the brilliant but
tragically ill-received
Juliette ou la Clef des
Songes.
© James Travers 2023
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Next Marcel Carné film:
Juliette ou La clef des songes (1951)