Film Review
Of all the films made in France in the aftermath of WWII, perhaps none catches
the mood of the time more effectively than
Un homme marche dans la ville,
the standout piece in a modest collection of films directed by Marcello Pagliero.
Greatly influenced by Italian neo-realism (through his many collaborations
with Roberto Rossellini as a screenwriter and actor in the mid-1940s), Pagliero
brought a similarly trenchant realist edge to his own films, and by doing
so he gets far closer to life as experienced by most ordinary people than
most other filmmakers of his period. In this, the first of around half
a dozen films he made in France, Pagliero takes a fairly routine plot - the
kind admirably suited for film melodrama of this era - and uses this as the
basis of a blisteringly honest record of the grim reality of post-war austerity
in a country that would take many years, if not decades, to live down the
humiliation of Nazi occupation.
Un homme marche dans la ville is an inspired adaptation of a posthumously
published novel of the same title by Jean Jausion, who drew on his experiences
as a dock worker in Le Havre during the Occupation. In the mid-to-late
1930s, Jausion was fast gaining a reputation as one of France's most promising
young poets and he could well have been as famous today as Jean Cocteau if
it hadn't been for the vicissitudes of war. After his Jewish wife-to-be
was arrested and deported to Auschwitz by the Nazis, Jausion became an active
member in the French Resistance and was tragically killed in action during
the Liberation of Paris in 1944, aged 27.
Marcello Pagliero's social concerns and realist approach to cinema made him
the ideal person to write and direct a screen version of Jausion's powerful
novel. In the years immediately prior to this, he had risen to prominence
as an actor in France, distinguishing himself with his portrayals of the
romantically doomed hero in such films as Jean Delannoy's
Les Jeux sont faits (1947)
and Yves Allégret's
Dédée
d'Anvers (1948). He had already directed a handful of films
in Italy, most notably
Roma città libera (1946) and
Desiderio (1946). The neo-realist
style that he had cultivated for his Italian films allowed Pagliero to take
his Jausion adaptation to the limits of social realism for late 1940s French
cinema, although in doing so he would earn himself no end of criticism.
Although
Un homme marche dans la ville received some highly favourable
reviews, it was fiercely lambasted by the Communist press, which condemned
it for its perceived portrayal of the working class as promiscuous, alcoholic
and loutish. The CGT, a leading workers' union, and the Catholic Church
were equally forceful in their condemnation of the film, and in the face
of such a vitriolic onslaught the film was banned in Le Havre not long after
its first release. It was most likely the hostile reaction to this
film that led its director to stick to safer, less controversial subjects
for his subsequent films. These include a somewhat more conventional
slice-of-life melodrama
Les Amants de bras-mort (1951) and a creditable
Sartre adaptation,
La Putain respectueuse
(1952).
Marcello Pagliero was by no means the first director to bring a more realist
style to French cinema. Jean Renoir had experimented with neo-realism
as early as 1935 with
Toni, his assistant
on this film being a man who would make the aesthetic his own in his early
Italian films, Luchino Visconti. Throughout the 1940s and into the
early 1950s, there was a trend towards a more naturalistic approach to film
drama, which was in no small measure assisted by the scarcity of resources
immediately after WWII. Although neo-realism never gained the level
of acceptance with French audiences that it had enjoyed in Italy (through
the work of Rossellini,
Luchino Visconti
and
Vittoria De Sica), there were several
notable French films with a similar approach - good examples being René
Clément's
Au-delà
des grilles (1949) and Paul Carpita's
Le Rendez-vous des quais
(1955).
Un homme marche dans la ville has many obvious similarities with Henri
Calef's
La Maison sous la mer
(1947). The two films have virtually the same plot and similar central
characters, both make effective use of their industrial setting, and both
employ a similar boldly realist style. As impressive as Calef's film
is both visually and dramatically, it lacks the sincerity and depth of genuine
human feeling that Pagliero brings to his film. The endless grind of
daily life, the constant gnawing worry over losing your job and not being
able to obtain food to feed your family - these are the sobering realities
of the time that Pagliero's film gets across with such devastating power.
It's true that the film's portrayal of ordinary folk is far from flattering.
Cast as the lead protagonist Madeleine is an actress renowned for playing
'bad women' - Ginette Leclerc. Ever since Marcel Pagnol's
La Femme du boulanger
(1935), Leclerc had pretty well been typecast as the woman of easy virtue
- the unfaithful wife or seductive femme fatale. Here she is just as
contemptible, in the role of a selfish wife who is all too willing to cheat
on her brutish husband André (a remarkable Robert Dalban) and force
herself on the most desirable man in the neighbourhood, Jean (Jean-Pierre
Kerien) - a man she subsequently betrays to the police when he rejects her.
The two male protagonists are just as ignoble, by no means heroic examples
of the proletariat class. The husband André is an archetypal
loser - resentful of his employers' treatment of him, he vents his anger
by getting blind drunk and beating his wife and infant child. No tears
are shed when he is sent to meet his maker.
André's buddy Jean may at first appear to be a more decent sort, showing
a comradely loyalty to his friend, but it isn't long before he starts to
look like a skunk, fending off boredom by drinking heavily and indulging
in one-night stands with buxom floozies instead of getting hitched and starting
a family. There isn't anything sympathetic or honourable about the
secondary characters either - just a gruesome assortment of brutes, drunkards
and contemptuous employers. The point is that whilst not one member
of the dramatis personae endears him- or herself to us, none of them is the
kind of two-dimensional caricature audiences would have been used to seeing
in film melodramas around this time. Visibly flawed they may be, but
the protagonists each occasionally shows a better side - even the seemingly
psychopathic Madeleine. Her maternal concern for her young child is
keenly felt, and whilst her despicable betrayal of Jean at the end of the
film is unforgivable we can readily see what led her to this desperate act.
Through some astute writing and incredibly subtle performances, the three
main characters encapsulate the predicament of those stuck in the lowest
stratum of society. By condemning the film for its unflattering representation
of one social class, Pagliero's detractors would seem to be totally oblivious
to the ugliness and injustice that is inherent in the world around them.
One of the most laudable aspects of
Un homme marche dans la ville
is how its location is used, not as a mere backdrop, but as a crucial part
of the narrative. The film begins and ends with a series of long panoramic
tracking shots across the sea port of Le Havre, a stunning montage that is
so intensely expressive of the penury and weariness that weighs down every
character in the drama. During the Occupation, the town had been a
crucial Nazi stronghold and it took three days of continual bombardment by
the Allies in September 1944 to liberate it. Over 2000 civilians died
in this onslaught from sea and sky and the scale of the Operation Astonia
bombing is at once apparent in the shattered remnants of a once thriving
town. Apartartment blocks stand precariously in a landscape strewn
with the sorry detritus of war, adjacent buildings half-demolished or else
totally reduced to dusty rubble.
Yet amid this stark post-apocalyptic vista life goes on - the port is still
a hubbub of activity, the din of machinery and manual labour fills the air.
The Le Havre that Pagliero's film paints is very different to the more romantic
(but equally grim) depiction we find in Marcel Carné's
Le Quai des brumes (1938)
and Julien Duvivier's
Le Paqueboat
Tenacity (1934). Here we see the port as a living, thriving
entity. Like the people who inhabit it, it is visibly damaged by its
recent past, there is a sadness and desolation that clings to it, and yet
it goes on, despite the weariness and the pain and the loss. At the
end of the film, it is not pessimism that you feel, but rather a sense of
the indomitable resilience - not just of one town, but of a nation, bruised
but not defeated. The fact that Marcello Pagliero was assisted on the
film by the writer-director Pierre Léaud is itself of interest.
The latter was the father of a young actor named Jean-Pierre Léaud
who, within a decade, would become emblematic of the French New Wave, a driving
force in France's cultural renaissance of the 1960s.
© James Travers 2022
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Film Synopsis
In the late 1940s, Madeleine and André Laurent live
in Le Havre, a town that appears as grimly desolate and battle-scarred as
their marriage. A dock worker, André barely earns enough money for
the two of them and their small child to live on, and he has a habit of taking
his frustrations out on his wife, particularly when he is under the influence
of alcohol. Things are so hard that André begs his friend Jean Sauviot
to ask their employer for a pay increase on his behalf - in vain. A
short while later, André loses his job when he causes an accident
that injures one of his co-workers. Madeleine is as fed up with her
miserable life as her husband is, but in the more good-natured Jean she sees
an opportunity for a fresh start.
Even though he has become sick of his solitary existence, Jean is reluctant
to get emotionally involved with his friend's wife, but in the end their
mutual attraction proves too strong for either of them to resist. The
first sign that André has that his wife is having an affair is when
he sees their infant son hanging about outside the place where they live.
Realising that he has been betrayed by the two people closest to him, André
is driven to a frenzy of anger and swears he will get even. His chance comes
one evening when he sees his enemy standing on the docks. André
attacks the man, not knowing that he is a complete stranger - an American
sailor who just happens to look like his friend. The sailor hits back and
in the violent tussle that follows André accidentally falls from a
great height to his death.
Madame Laurent does not shed many tears when she learns that her husband
is dead. Her overly romantic nature convinces her that her lover murdered
him so that they could be together. Already she is planning her future
life with Jean, but Jean will have none of this. The sudden death of
his unfortunate friend makes it impossible for him to continue the love affair
with the dead man's wife. Embittered by this rejection, Madeleine betrays
him to the police, insisting that her lover confessed his crime to her immediately
after killing André. Fortunately, Jean is able to provide himself
with an alibi for the night of the supposed crime, so he is cleared of the
charge of murder. Realising that Madeleine's seemingly heartless reaction
to her husband's death was motivated by love of him, Jean returns to her
to ask her forgiveness. When he receives no reply after knocking on
her door, he leaves Madeleine a note asking to see her and then walks away,
not knowing that she has committed suicide.
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.