Film Review
Henri-Georges Clouzot is justly celebrated as one of the masters of
French cinema, but his reputation rests on a handful of films -
Le
Corbeau (1943),
Le Salaire de la peur (1955)
and
Les Diaboliques (1955) - whilst
much of his work is underrated, misunderstood or else all but
forgotten. It's hard to account for the comparative obscurity of
his final film,
La Prisonnière,
Clouzot's one and only colour film, made in that tumultuous spring of
1968. An honest and fascinating study in the perversity of
desire, it is arguably Clouzot's most profound work, and, thanks to
Andréas Winding's mesmerisingly beautiful cinematography, his
most visually alluring.
With its portrayal of a bourgeois young woman seeking escape from an
unfulfilled marriage by living out her sadomasochistic fantasies,
La Prisonnière vaguely
resembles Luis Buñuel's
Belle de jour (1967), but,
lacking Buñuel's dark humour and surreal flights of fancy,
Clouzot's film takes on a somewhat more disturbing aspect. "Tout
le monde est voyeur", one character observes early on in the film, and,
perhaps inspired by Michael Powell's
Peeping
Tom (1960), Clouzot proves the truth of this by making
us all voyeurs as we watch with macabre fascination as Elisabeth Wiener
and Laurent Terzief embark on a strange game of domination and
submission.
Contrary to our expectations, it is not the game that makes the two
main protagonists - art dealer Stan and his mistress Josée -
prisoners, but the invisible chains of their petit-bourgeois
existence. Josée is trapped in a sterile marriage and is
clearly on the look out for some extra-marital excitement. Stan
is a control freak who, incapable of having 'normal' relationships with
women, can only be gratified by photographing them in degrading
poses. Her interest aroused by a strategically placed film slide,
Josée willingly makes herself Stan's prisoner, but what starts
out as the classic master-slave relationship soon develops into a
genuine, mutually felt romantic attachment. A shared taste for
the decidely kinky proves to be the mechanism by which Josée and
Stan are liberated from their state of emotional incarceration.
Submission equals deliverance, for both of them.
Throughout the film, Clouzot takes an obvious delight in cocking a
snook at bourgeois respectability. For him, this is no more than
a trompe-l'oeil, as devious and flagrantly superficial as the
eye-catching but meretricious exhibits in Stan's modern art
gallery. Everyone is a voyeur, everyone is prone to sordid
fantasies, but middleclass propriety does its damnedest to persuade us
this is not so. The grotesque act of sex is sanctified by the
holy state of matrimony and our voyeuristic yearnings are safely
contained, even legitimised, by cinema and television. The one
unifying theme to Clouzot's oeuvre is a burning contempt for bourgeois
hypocrisy, and in his
opus ultimum
he goes as far as the censor and good taste will permit him in his
attempt to exorcise the sham that prevents us from seeing who we really
are.
What is perhaps most remarkable about
La
Prisonnière is that it disturbs without shocking.
There are a few scenes where Clouzot flirts openly with eroticism - the
most salacious being the one in which Dany Carrel strips and poses
suggestively in a see-through plastic mac for snaphappy Terzief - but
what he shows is tame, even for the standards of the era in which the
film was made. It is what Clouzot implies, rather than what he
puts on the screen, that disturbs us - namely, that by taking pleasure
in watching the film we are as warped as the protagonists within
it.
The film's opening sequence shows a bespectacled weirdo (later revealed
to be Stan) toying with several dolls, deriving obvious pleasure as he
fondles and animates them with his fingers. Knowing something of
Clouzot's tendency to dominate and control his actors, effectively
treating them as passive playthings, we can readily identify him with
Stan. By implication, Josée represents the film's
spectator, the lip-licking voyeur willing to lap up whatever sordid
fantasy the director has in store for her. Well before we get to
the end of
La Prisonnière,
we realise that it is intended as a mirror, in which Clouzot shows us
our true nature.
If
La Prisonnière does
contain a shock, it comes right at the end - the grand finale, not just
to the film but also to Clouzot's entire filmmaking career. Those
familiar with this director's better known work will already be aware
that he has a habit of signing off with a bang (literally in the
case of
Le Salaire de la peur),
but what he reserves for his final film is way beyond anything we might
have expected. What we get is a cinematic spectacle that is every
bit as dynamic and startling as the famous Stargate trip in Kubrick's
2001: A Space Odyssey, which
(coincidentally?) had its first screening just as Clouzot was shooting
his film.
A quick-fire montage of weirdly psychedelic images burst from the
screen, drawing us deeper into Josée's subconscious mind as it
pulls back from the brink of death. Hundreds of shots are blasted
onto our retinas in a matter of minutes, making up a fragmented collage
of memories and bizarre fantasies which is all the more spectacular for
the use of coloured filters and rotating lights. The sounds
we hear are just as disconcerting, an eerie mélange of
of Mahler and Musique Concrète. It's similar to
the ending that Clouzot had planned for his previous film
L'Enfer (1964), which he had been
forced to abandon for health reasons. The test shots that Clouzot
had taken for this earlier film (the centrepiece of Serge Bromberg's
2009 documentary
L'Enfer d'Henri-Georges Clouzot)
are strikingly similar to what he managed to include in his explosive
finale to
La Prisonnière
- a dazzling visual fantasia giving the starkest representation of a
mind fractured by desire and neurosis. What better way to end an
illustrious film career than with a total surrender to artistic freedom?
© James Travers, Willems Henri 2015
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Next Henri-Georges Clouzot film:
L'Assassin habite au 21 (1942)