Film Review
It is no exaggeration to say that, in the immediate aftermath of World
War I, French cinema was well and truly in the doldrums. A
scarcity of resources coupled with ever-growing competition from the
other side of the Atlantic meant that every French film director had
his work cut out, but by the mid-1920s French cinema was beginning to
enjoy a spectacular reversal of fortune. Spearheading this
unexpected renaissance was Raymond Bernard's
Le Miracle des loups, a lavish
historical drama which, with a budget of eight million francs, was one
of the most expensive films ever made at the time. The phenomenal
success of this film not only inflated the ambitions of French
filmmakers and producers, it also raised the quality bar expected by
mainstream audiences, resulting in a foray of impressive
super-productions to rival anything being made in Hollywood during this
extraordinary decade.
What makes this all the more surprising is that Raymond Bernard was
not, at the time, an esteemed auteur with a stack of great films
already under his belt. He was a young and comparatively
inexperienced jobbing film director, mostly preoccupied with adapting
the plays of his illustrious father, Tristan Bernard, for Gaumont,
having worked as an assistant to Jacques Feyder. The 33-year-old
Bernard had yet to make a name for himself but he had great ambitions,
and these led him to leave Gaumont and form his own production company,
the Société des Films Historiques, with two well-known
writers, Henry Dupuis-Mazuel and Jean-José Frappa. The
first film this trio tackled was an adaptation of Dupuis-Mazuel's
recently published historical novel,
Le
Miracle des loups, a fictional 15th century romance woven into
an authentic account of Louis XI's attempts to form a united France
after the 100 Years' War. The film's success was followed by that
of
Le Joueur d'échecs
(1926), again directed by Bernard and based on another of
Dupuis-Mazuel's novels. These two films established Raymond
Bernard's reputation as a serious filmmaker in France, and his success
continued well into the sound era, with such films as the WWI drama
Les Croix de bois (1932) and
epic Victor Hugo adaptation
Les Misérables (1934).
Le Miracle des loups has been
described as the French equivalent to America's
The Birth of a Nation (1915)
and the influence of the latter film's director, D.W. Griffith, is
readily apparent in the film's elaborate and astonishingly convincing
battle sequences. Bernard's main inspiration was in fact another
D.W. Griffith film,
Intolerance (1916), whose siege
of Babylon provided a template for the siege of Beauvais at the end of
Bernard's film. Filmed mostly on the historical ramparts of
Carcassonne (because those of Beauvais no longer existed), with four
thousand extras roped in to play the opposing armies and besieged
inhabitants of the town, this is one of the most spectacular action
sequences to grace any French film, and it still has a jaw-dropping
impact. Some slick editing and daring camerawork bring an
appalling sense of reality to these scenes of mayhem and destruction,
holding the spectator's attention in a vicelike grip as the visual
extravaganza builds to a cataclysmic finale.
The film boasts two other set-pieces which are just as
remarkable. The Battle of Montlhéry, the first of the
fierce skirmishes to be depicted on screen, contains the film's most
shocking images and brought a stark new realism to the portrayal of
medieval combat in cinema. Not content with filming the battle
from a distances, as was typically done at the time with films of this
nature, Bernard takes us right into the heart of the conflict by using
a lightweight portable camera, the Debrie Sept, which Abel Gance
would later use extensively on
Napoléon (1927).
Romantic ideas of medieval warfare are brutally undercut by the stark
images that Bernard throws at us, of human heads being crushed to pulp
and swords being ripped from the mutilated carcasses of dead and dying
soldiers. As in his subsequent
Les
Croix de bois, Bernard never lets us forget the savagery and
degrading inhumanity of war.
The other stand-out episode, which occurs midway through the film, is
the one in which the heroine, Jeanne Fouquet, is miraculously saved
from her enemies by the timely intervention of a pack of wild
wolves. What begins as a weird, fairytale-like digression from
the main drama concludes with another burst of visceral horror as the
wolves suddenly become animated and starting biting lumps out of
Jeanne's pursuers. As the wolves and dogs employed in this
sequence were in fact as tame as poodles or half dead it is a testament
to the skill and commitment of everyone involved (the cameramen,
stuntmen, editor and director) that what ended up on the screen is so
nightmarishly authentic. In one shot, you'd swear a poor actor
had his hand bitten off.
There is more to
Le Miracle des loups
than its three set-pieces (four if you include the lively festival
which opens the film and provides an ironic counterpoint to its
apocalyptic ending). It is a compelling, well-structured drama
that effectively combines romantic and political intrigue, well-served
by a formidable cast of actors from the French stage. Leading the
company is a suitably morose and mercurial Charles Dullin - his Louis
XI isn't so much a benign monarch (even if his aim of unifying France
is presented as a noble one), as a constantly calculating strategist,
of the kind who could probably have taught Niccolò Machiavelli a
thing or to. With his imposing bear-like physique Vanni-Marcoux's
Charles the Bold makes an almost surreal contrast with Dullin's spindly
King Louis, although it is a shame that the actor's distinctive voice
remains unheard. One of France's leading opera singers,
Vanni-Marcoux appeared in a few other films, but we only ever get to
hear him in one film, Marc Allégret's
Sans
famille (1934).
The conflicted knight Robert Cottereau, a man tragically torn between
love and duty, is admirably played by another fine stage actor, Romuald
Joubé, who is best known for playing the poet Jean Diaz in Abel
Gance's
J'accuse (1919). Yvonne
Sergyl makes a surprisingly feisty heroine as Jeanne Fouquet, coming
into her own in the battle scenes at the end of the film, where, as an
axe-wielding warrior she acquires the soubriquet Jeanne Hachette.
A future star of French cinema Albert Préjean appears several
times in the film in the capacity of a stuntman (he is one of the
unfortunates who gets mauled by the wolves). Armand Bernard (no
relation to the director) provides some welcome comic relief, just as
he had done in the role of Planchet in Henri Diamant-Berger's
Les Trois mousquetaires (1921).
After its premiere at the Paris Opéra on 13th November 1924, in
the presence of such important personages as the French President
Gaston Doumergue,
Le Miracle des
loups went on to become a major critical and commercial
success. One reviewer who didn't think much of it was Abel Gance,
who dismissed it as a bad film lacking in both art and drama. The
American critics were almost as scathing of the film, but none of this
prevented it from being a major landmark in French cinema.
Bernard was soon being feted as France's answer to D.W. Griffith and
the film's success encouraged filmmakers to attempt even grander
cinematic pageants. With the advent of sound,
Le Miracle des loups was re-edited
and re-released in 1930 as a sound version, running to 73
minutes. The film was
remade in 1961 by
André Hunebelle with Jean Marais taking the lead role in a
lacklustre crowdpleaser that can scarcely hold a dead match let alone a
candle to the original. Recently restored, Raymond Bernard's
first historical epic blazes with bravado and brilliance - one French
film from the silent era that will definitely take your breath away.
© James Travers 2015
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Next Raymond Bernard film:
Le Joueur d'échecs (1927)