Film Review
For Jean Epstein, one of the avant-garde giants of the silent era,
the birth of cinema was as significant a milestone in man's cultural development as Einstein's
Theory of Relativity, both being landmark events that would forever
change our relationship with time. The cinematograph was
the first device that man had created which allows us to 'see' time, or
rather 'observe' the passage of time through a succession of events,
which once recorded on film, can be played back again and again.
Time is no longer a vague abstract concept, it is something we
can directly interact with. What a curious coincidence that H.G.
Wells's
The Time Machine was
first published in the same year that the Lumière brothers
unveiled their famous cinematograph.
Epstein was not slow to realise the artistic possibilities of
'manipulating' time through cinema. By undercranking or
overcranking the film camera, time could be made to appear to slow down
or speed up when images are projected, at normal speed, onto a
screen. Time could even be sent backwards, just by reversing the
film. Such temporal distortion became an integral part of
Epstein's impressionistic approach to cinema, a means by which the
psychological states of the characters in his films could be revealed -
a way of permitting us to see into their soul.
Le Tempestaire translates as
'Storm Tamer', someone who has the power to calm the elements (tides,
storms, winds, rain), but it could equally apply to Epstein himself,
the
cinémagicien who,
through his temporal manipulations, controls everything within his
realm of cinematic illusion, a realm that links the visible world of sensory perception
with the hidden world of the imagination. In his penultimate film, Epstein
revels in his power as a filmmaker and the result is his most beguiling
and mysterious work. Inspired by an old Breton legend and set in the director's
adopted homeland of Brittany,
Le Tempestaire
is a captivating poem on the sea that is both an avant-garde
masterpiece and a haunting evocation of man's complex relationship with the
natural world.
This is a film that Epstein had wanted to make for over a decade, but
events conspired to thwart this ambition. For the duration of the
Occupation, he was prohibited from making films on account of his
Jewish origins, and after the war he had difficulty finding a producer
willing to back such an unusual (and most probably unprofitable)
film. It was Nino Constantini, an actor who appeared in a number
of his silent films of the 1920s (including
Mauprat),
who came to his aid in 1946. Having recently founded his own film
production company Film-Magazine, Constantini gave Epstein free rein to
make the experimental short that was to be his most remarkable film of
the sound era.
The most groundbreaking aspect of
Le
Tempestaire is Epstein's experimentation with sound. The
aural landscape that the film offers is as vivid and uncannily lyrical
as the images, comprising a subtly expressive score by Yves Baudrier
and an old Breton song, perfectly wedded with natural sounds, the
latter treated (speeded up or slowed down, in parallel with the
pictures) to create a truly eerie effect. When the human
protagonists speak, it is in a way that is oddly lacking in urgency and
emotion but fits with the rhythm of the film as a whole. Sound is
an integral part of
Le Tempestaire
and contributes as much to the film's indefinable poetry as what we see
on the screen. The raw Breton setting would have been a
characterless desert without the incessant murmuring of the
winds. The seas would have been robbed of their potency had the
roar of the waves been stifled. Sound is what brings Nature to life and
makes it the dominant protagonist in Epstein's film, reducing the
humans to feeble victims of its heartless caprice.
Right from the start of the film, Nature appears to be in command, a
living entity with a will of its own and a temper to match. The
credits are played over erratic tracking shots of a wild seascape in
which the camera appears to be buffeted like a kite in the wind.
Then there is an unearthly stillness, as if time has suddenly
stopped. One storm has passed, another is imminent. The
human protagonists, frozen like statues, suddenly come to life and the
story begins. As it does so, a feeling of expectancy slowly
spreads over us. How easily do we identify with the woman who fears for
the life of her fiancé as he prepares to go off to sea.
Outside the woman's shack we see that a storm is brewing.
Gradually, almost imperceptibly, nature's calm is turning to
fury. It is at times such as this that we feel impelled to turn
to magic and legend to keep us from harm. The Storm Tamer will
protect us.
The meeting of the young woman and the ancient Storm Tamer is one of
the most unsettling in Epstein's oeuvre. The shots of the woman
appear to be very slightly slowed down whilst those of her age-worn
redeemer are played at normal speed, creating a strange, almost
mystical disconnection between the two characters.
They inhabit the same physical space but their psychological worlds
are lightyears apart. What we observe is a kind of contest, a test of the
woman's faith, and in the end her faith triumphs. The old man yields one last time and through
his mysterious art Nature is calmed. As if by magic, the woman's
fiancé suddenly appears and the Storm Tamer's dark crystal ball
shatters into a thousand pieces. This being Epstein's
last film but one, it is tempting to read a deeper significance into
this ending. The fracturing of the crystal ball reminds us of
Prospero breaking his staff at the end of Shakespeare's
The Tempest. Can it be that Epstein,
having attained the pinacle of his art and conscious of his own
mortality, must now abjure the sorcery he has toyed with for a quarter of a century?
Like the old man in the film, he seems bound to let the magic slip from his
fingers and seek out a new master...
© James Travers 2015
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Next Jean Epstein film:
Les Feux de la mer (1948)