Film Review
Pierre Choderlos de Laclos claimed that his main motivation for writing
Les Liaisons dangereuses, the
most scandalous novel of the 18th century, was 'to create some stir in
the world and continue to do so after [he] had gone from it'.
Director Roger Vadim might well have had the same objective in mind for
his liberal adaptation of Laclos's inflammatory text, and his film
certainly provoked a fair amount of controversy. Having met with
a barrage of criticism for its supposedly immoral tone, Vadim's
contemporary take on
Les Liaisons
dangereuses was banned in several town in France and ended up
with a 16 certificate. Just as the condemnation of the high-minded
moralists had helped to make Laclos's novel a society bestseller on
its release in 1782, so the furore surrounding Vadim's film helped to
make it a box office hit, with an audience of 4.3 million in France
alone. One body that objected most strongly to the film on its
initial release was the writers' association Sociéte des gens de
lettres de France, which insisted that its title be changed to
Les Liaisons dangereuses 1960 as
they felt it strayed too far from Laclos's novel and therefore could
not legitimately bear its title.
At the time, Vadim was no stranger to controversy. His first
film,
Et Dieu... créa la femme
(1956), had been attacked for its overt eroticism and portrayal of
women as objects of male desire. Vadim revelled in such
criticism; he saw himself as an agent provocateur, on a mission to
expose the failings of an increasingly decadent bourgeois society, but
many saw him as a shameless self-publicist who was as morally deficient
as those he sought to pillory in his films. By
time-shifting Laclos's novel from the 1760s to the 1950s, Vadim was
able to deliver the most damning assault on a stratum of French society
that had much in common with the profligate nobility of
pre-revolutionary France. That the film provoked such a hostile
reaction could be taken as a sign that it was not too far from the
truth.
In Vadim's film, Laclos's satanic anti-heroes, the Marquise de
Merteuil and Vicomte de Valmont, are reincarnated as a pair of depraved
socialites, played to perfection by two of French cinema's most iconic
actors, Jeanne Moreau and Gérard Philipe. Moreau was just
a few years away from becoming a darling of the French New Wave, though
her breakthrough role in François Truffaut's
Jules
et Jim (1962). Tragically, Philipe would be dead
within three months of the film's release, carried off by an
untreatable cancer at the age of 36 - this was his penultimate film
appearance. One of the great strengths of Vadim's
Les Liaisons dangereuses is that,
whilst Moreau and Philipe never allow us to forget the sickening
villainy of their characters, we cannot help succumbing to their
charms. As in the novel, Merteuil and Valmont fill us with
revulsion, but they also fascinate us, and in the end we are even
compelled to feel sympathy for them. They are not so much
monsters as pitiful souls living in a moral vacuum, representatives of
a thoroughly rotten society that is contemptuous of virtue and addicted
to the most shallow of pleasures.
Marianne Tourvel and Cécile Volanges (played respectively by
Vadim's future wife Annette Stroyberg and Jeanne Valérie)
personify those qualities of womanhood that Vadim himself greatly
admired, an admirable challenge for the scheming Merteuil and
Valmont. All of Vadim's films are, to a greater or lesser extent,
an intimate study in the female psyche, and it is the contrast between
Marianne and Cécile which seems to be the director's main
concern. Whilst Marianne represents some kind of romantic ideal,
the incorruptible acme of feminine virtue, Cécile is a moral
pragmatist who always seeks simple solutions to difficult
problems. Cécile submits to Valmont as this is the easiest
way to prevent him from ruining her future plans of marital
happiness. By contrast, Valmont's seduction of Marianne is
achieved not by cunning but by the special alchemy of love. The
purity of Valmont's feelings for Marianne could not be further from the
perverse nature of his relationship with his wife Merteuil, who regards
love as a trap that must be avoided at all costs. The irony, of
course, is that Merteuil has herself become snared, through her fondest
feelings for Valmont, and this is what ultimately destroys her.
The fifth crucial protagonist in this hideously tangled web of intrigue
is Cécile's reluctant fiancé, Danceny, a seemingly harmless geek
who turns out to be the most dangerous of adversaries
(being a mathematician, he could have
bored Valmont to death with a treatise on differential
calculus if he had been so inclined). The part of Danceny
allowed Jean-Louis Trintignant to resume his acting career after his
military service, having almost walked away from the profession after
falling foul of the paparazzi during the making of
Dieu... créa la femme.
Another face to watch out for is the avant-garde writer Boris Vian, who
puts in a rare film appearance, shortly before his death in June 1959.
An essential ingredient of the film is its highly innovative jazz
soundtrack, most of which was supplied by the legendary American jazz
pianist and composer Thelonious Monk, with a few additional pieces by
Art Blakey and the Jazz Messengers. Presumably influenced by
Louis Malle's recent
Ascenseur pour l'échafaud
(1958), Vadim uses jazz to give his film a chic modernity that would
set it apart from the stuffy one-size-fits-all melodramas that had come
to dominate French cinema in the 1950s. The film's use of jazz
isn't a cheap marketing ploy - it really does complement the subject
matter, giving the film a sweet aura of decadence, as enigmatic and
strangely alluring as the central villains of the piece, Merteuil and
Valmont.
In Vadim's famously uneven oeuvre there is no film that is as
consistently well-constructed and elegant as
Les Liaisons dangereuses. At
a time when colour was beginning to overtake monochrome in France,
Vadim shows just how beautiful and evocative a black-and-white film can
be, and does so in almost every one of his carefully composed
shots. Vadim's tendency to over-egg the pudding is apparent in a
few sequences where exaggerated zooms and voyeuristic camera movement are
used a little too self-consciously. The chess motif that is
established in the opening credits sequence is used effectively
throughout the film to remind us that everything we see on screen is a
game meticulously engineered by two calculating intellects, not the
diabolical duo Merteuil and Valmont, but Vadim and his co-screenwriter
Roger Vailland.
Stephen Frears' lavish period piece
Dangerous Liaisons (1988) may
be a more faithful rendition of Laclos's literary masterpiece but
Vadim's version has just as much going for it - strong performances
from a charismatic cast, a mise-en-scène that is effortlessly
stylish, a compelling narrative and (best of all) a jazz score to die
for. Transposing Laclos's story of 18th century intrigue to the
1950s was a stroke of genius on Vadim's part and reveals what is
perhaps most shocking about
Les
Liaisons dangereuses - its inherent timelessness. Every
age, it seems, will have its Marquise de Merteuil and Vicomte de
Valmont...
© James Travers 2013
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Next Roger Vadim film:
Et mourir de plaisir (1960)