Film Review
In lists of the avant-garde French filmmakers who committed themselves
to exploring the artistic possibilities of cinema in its early years
the one name that tends to get overlooked most often is that of Dimitri
Kirsanoff. An émigré from Imperial Russia,
Kirsanoff's interest in cinema began when he started playing in an
orchestra at screenings of silent films in the early 1920s. He
made his first film,
L'Ironie du
destin, in 1923, which he followed up three years later with the
film for which he is best known,
Ménilmontant.
Although clearly influenced by the work of his contemporaries - most
notably Abel Gance and Sergei Eisenstein - Kirsanoff was able to bring
something new to the still pliable medium of cinema. In
Ménilmontant, he masterfully
combines sophisticated montage techniques and camera effects to
transform a conventional melodrama into a dazzling subjective
experience, throughout which our senses and feelings are assailed by a
chaotic flurry of impressions. Watching the film is as
exhilarating and scarily unfamiliar as walking through a hailstorm in
your pyjamas during a hurricane.
Kirsanoff's early films are a sublime example of what has come to be
known as 'impressionistic cinema'. Abel Gance, Germaine Dulac,
Jean Epstein, Marcel L'Herbier and Louis Delluc all dabbled with
impressionism but Kirsanoff is arguably the only filmmaker who made it
central to his art and revealed just how powerful a form of cinematic
expression it could be. In the films of Gance and Dulac,
impressionistic devices such as superimposition, skewed camera angles
and slow motion are used tentatively, arbitrarily and sometimes
unnecessarily, but for Kirsanoff (and to an almost equal degree
Epstein) impressionism is the heart and soul of his oeuvre, not an
afterthought or calculated embellishment. There is a level of
consistency and confidence in Kirsanoff's impressionism which is hard
to find in the work of his avant-garde peers.
Ménilmontant is the one
impressionistic film that can definitely be labelled a timeless
masterpiece. Whereas many of the films of the Parisian
avant-garde of the 1920s now appear pretentious, florid or lacking in
artistic coherence,
Ménilmontant
has a reality and solidity to it that makes it an intensely absorbing
human drama as well as an incredibly daring piece of cinema art.
The film opens with a dramatic hook that cannot fail to grab the
attention. Using the 'accelerated montage' that Gance had
employed so brilliantly in his film
La
Roue (1923), Kirsanoff hurls us headfirst into the bloody arena
of an axe murder. Just as in the shower scene in Hitchcock's
Psycho
(1960), the frenzied editing mirrors the ferocity of the axe attack, so
that every cut feels like a murderous blow. The reaction of one
of the victims' daughters to the murder reinforces our sense of horror
and disbelief - this is made more viscerally affecting through a
combination of a zoom and jump-cut close-up. The same device is
used later in the film when the same girl witnesses her betrayal by her
lover, one of several instances in which the film wraps back on itself
like a Möbius strip, connecting past and present.
The inability of the two daughters of the axe victims to escape their
past becomes the film's central theme and is evident when they have
settled in Ménilmontant, a working class neighbourhood of Paris
set on a hill overlooking the capital. The narrow cobbled
streets, drab and featureless, come to resemble a prison, and in one
scene one of the sisters is seen chalking marks on a wall, as a
prisoner might to mark the years of his incarceration. One sister
is seduced and abandoned by a good-for-nothing Don Juan, left with an
unwanted baby and driven to the brink of suicide, only to witness her
older sibling being lured down the same track. The film ends as
it begins, with a crime of passion - the wheel turns full circle with
one brutal killing exorcising, or maybe reinforcing, the memory of
another.
One of the most striking features of the film is how much is left
unsaid. There are no inter-titles, so Kirsanoff leaves it to the
spectator to interpret the plot ellipses and ambiguities in whatever
way he or she chooses. The film also has an extraordinary degree
of economy. There is not a second in the film that is wasted, not
a shot that is superfluous. There are sequences where the pace is
dizzying frenetic - the most spectacular being the first glimpse of the
busy metropolis, where the camera moves so fast that all we see is a
confused blur of activity - but there are also moments of exquisite
stillness. The most heart-warming scene is the one in which the
younger sister shares a meal with an old tramp on a park bench.
Homeless and penniless, the young woman seeks temporary refuge from her
present misery by dreaming of a life of luxury. When she returns
to reality, she is cheered when a stranger takes pity on her and,
without a word, offers her a few scraps of food. What makes the
scene so memorable and so poignant is the near-documentary reality that
Nadia Sibirskaia (Kirsanoff's wife and muse at the time) brings to
it. As she gratefully chews on the morsels of food, the camera
frames her adoringly and makes her an icon of female suffering.
With the two sisters apparently reunited through their separate
misfortunes at the end of the film, are we to assume that they have now
put their unhappy past behind them, or, from the ominous closing shot of
the Seine dissolving into darkness, are we to conclude that further
misfortunes lie ahead? Dimitri Kirsanoff signs off his most
perfect film with a teasing question mark and you are left not only
stunned by his artistry but also wondering how he managed to compress
such an epic tale on the cruelty of existence into such a small
space.
Ménilmontant
is a film that, once seen, will never leave you.
© James Travers 2015
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.