Film Review
In the mid-1940s, a sudden surge of interest in Freud's
psychoanalytical theories, particularly the meaning of dreams, resulted
in a slew of films in which dreams played a central part. Alfred
Hitchcock's
Spellbound (1945) was the most
prominent of these, but there were many others, mostly B-movies such as
Maxwell Shane's
Fear in the Night
(1947), which made the most of the popular craze whilst it
lasted. Edgar G. Ulmer's
Strange
Illusion was one of the first films of this ilk, one whose lack
of narrative sophistication and even more obvious lack of budget is
made up for by the director's penchant for moody atmospherics.
What could so easily have been a pedestrian crime drama inelegantly
fashioned after Shakespeare's
Hamlet
becomes, in Ulmer's deft hands, an eerie study in obsession with an
unremitting aura of doom, marred only by some unfortunate casting
decisions.
The film begins and ends with possibly the spookiest sequences of
Ulmer's entire oeuvre, a fog-wreathed dream in which a stark silhouette
inveigles its way menacingly into a bereaved family. When the
mist fades and the dream ends abruptly, we are catapulted back into the
land of the living, but the same sense of something rotten persists,
growing more intense as the plot develops and builds to its fast and
gripping denouement. Here, Ulmer struggles to make the
practically non-existent budget stretch to fill the canvas he has
allotted himself and the cost-cutting is more obvious than in his other
films because of this. Unable to hire top league actors, he has
to make the best of the second-raters at his disposal; rear projection
is used with gay abandon to obviate the need for expensive location
shooting; and the cardboard sets look as if they might fall down as
soon as anyone sneezed. Yet, cheap as the film looks, at no point
does it appear shoddy or unprofessional. Ulmer's particular
genius was making art out of next to nothing, and whilst
Strange Illusion is far from being
his best film it's an enjoyable entertainment that can hold its own
alongside more pristine noir offerings of this era, even Hitchcock's
Freudian digression.
That James Lydon was cast in the lead role probably had more to do with
his popularity at the time than to his innate abilities as an
actor. Having started out as a promising adolescent in such films
as Robert Stevenson's
Tom Brown's
School Days (1940), Lydon became famous through the series of
Henry Aldrich films in which he starred for Paramount Pictures.
His character in
Strange Illusion
is Henry Aldrich in all but name, a cartoonish juvenile with
a knack of getting himself into trouble. Lydon comes across more
as a colourless brat who is too full of himself than as a sympathetic
hero in peril, so we take a relish in his dicing with danger and end up
half-hoping that he will make one slip too many and wind up as cat food.
Lydon's singular inability to arouse our sympathies makes it dead easy
for Warren William and Charles Arnt to gain our support as the vile
nasties who threaten the cocky juvenile and his noisome family.
Warren William's glory years may have been well behind him by this time
(he was a big star in the 1930s) but
Strange
Illusion gives him plenty of scope to chill and thrill us with
another of his great villainous portrayals. It's an odd turn of
events that we end up caring more for the villains than the good guys,
and you can't help wondering that this was Ulmer's intention,
subverting a tedious Nancy Drew style mystery so that the spectator
becomes a sadistic voyeur consciously wishing the destruction of a
dull-as-ditchwater all-American family. Were he not constrained
by the public sensibilities of the time (to say nothing of the Censor),
Ulmer might well have ended the film with William and Arnt gloating in
triumph over the broken bodies of Lydon and his dismal entourage - at
least that would have been closer in spirit to the play as Shakespeare
had written it. Alas, unlike the famed Danish prince, Henry
Aldrich had to live to fight (and bore) another day.
© James Travers 2015
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Film Synopsis
College student Paul Cartwright experiences a troubled dream in which
he is reminded of the tragic death of his father, a prominent judge who
was killed when his car collided with a train. In the dream, the
silhouette of a stranger appears with Paul's mother and sister, seeming
to take the place of his dead father. Fearing that his mother may
be in danger, Paul cancels his fishing holiday with his mentor Dr
Vincent and returns home, to find that his mother is already being
courted by another man, Brett Curtis. It looks as if Paul's dream
is already starting to come true... Looking through his father's
papers, Paul soon has reason to think that Curtis may be a notorious
criminal whose wife drowned not long after their marriage.
Apparently concerned by Paul's increasingly neurotic behaviour,
Professor Muhlbach, the owner of a nearby sanatorium, advises his
mother to have him placed in his care. Realising that Muhlbach is
in cahoots with Curtis, Paul plays along with the professor and enters
the sanatorium as a 'guest'. Now that the troublesome son is in a
position where he can easily be got rid of, Curtis and Muhlbach put
into action their cruel plan of revenge against Mrs Cartwright...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.