Film Review
The first film to successfully combine horror and science-fiction
elements in a contemporary setting,
The
Thing From Another World remains one of the best examples of its
genre, in spite of its dearth of special effects and extreme budgetary
limitations. The film spawned a veritable barrage of inferior
B-movie sci-fi monster romps and was the inspiration for John
Carpenter's ambitious but hopelessly flawed 1982 remake,
The Thing. Whereas
The Day the Earth Stood Still,
released the same year, gave us an optimistic portrayal of man's first
contact with an alien species,
The
Thing From Another World goes to the other extreme, presenting
audiences with the kind of extra-terrestrial monstrosity they would
become more familiar with, one that would rip out your intestines and
turn you into a nice tasty snack before it even got round to whipping
out its business card and saying hello (a bit like double glazing
salesmen in fact).
This gloomier portrayal of alien contact was far more in tune with the
prevailing mood of the time. In the aftermath of Hiroshima, the
general public had grown wary of scientific progress and increasingly
saw scientists as dangerous fanatics who would ultimately bring about
the destruction of mankind. Meanwhile, the emergence of the
Soviet Union as a superpower was fuelling anti-Communist paranoia,
particularly in the United States, where political opportunists used
fear of an imminent Soviet invasion to their own end. Whilst it
may not have been intended as a political film,
The Thing From Another World
manages to capture these concerns vividly, providing a template for a
whole raft of sci-fi B-movies that would thrill and chill audiences
over the ensuing decade.
One of the big debates about this film is
who actually directed it.
Although Christian Nyby is credited as the film's director, it is
widely believed that the real creative force behind it was its producer, Howard
Hawks, one of the most talented and versatile filmmakers working in
Hollywood at the time. Hawks had already earned a name for
himself with such diverse genres as gangster thrillers (
Scarface,
1932), screwball comedies (
His Girl Friday, 1940) and
classic westerns (
Red River, 1948), but it still
seems extraordinary that he would define, if not invent, a whole new
genre, the sci-fi horror movie. Hawks's influence on
The Thing From Another World can be
felt both in its artistic design (the confined, claustrophobic setting
and use of harsh lighting), its near-documentary realism, and its
convincing portrayal of human interaction in a stressful situation.
The Thing From Another World
may tread new ground in the sci-fi department but it is also an
effective homage to the old Universal horror films of the 1930s.
The creature, a lumbering seven foot monstrosity that is only seen
fleetingly, almost entirely in shadowy long shot, bears a striking
resemblance to Universal's Frankenstein monster. The darkly
oppressive mood (achieved through slick lighting and ingenious set
design) also evoke something of the early Universal horror films,
although somehow Hawks manages to make his film far more chilling and
sinister. Here, the monster is an amalgam of all the great
Universal horror icons - it looks like a hybrid of Frankenstein's
monster and the Mummy, it has the ferocity of the Wolf Man, and, best
of all, it has an appetite for human blood that makes Dracula seem like
a casual drinker.
The film was inspired by the short story
Who Goes There? by John W.
Campbell, Jr. (under the pseudonym Don A. Stuart). Hawks and his
screenwriter, Charles Lederer, dispensed with the more fanciful
elements of the story (such as the ability of the alien to change its
shape) to focus our attention on its human aspects,
particularly the reaction to the threat of an alien attack
and the conflict between scientific curiosity and the base
instinct for survival. The
understated yet compelling performances - notably from Kenneth
Tobey and Margaret Sheridan - and an intelligent screenplay make
up for the lack of special effects and the low budget sets. The
result is an engrossing and thoroughly spine-tingling science-fiction
horror film, arguably the best of its kind, and one that will
definitely give you nightmares, especially when the snow falls.
Watch the skies, and tremble.
© James Travers 2010
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Film Synopsis
At the North Pole, a group of scientists led by Dr Carrington are
engaged on important research into Arctic conditions. When a
large metal object crash-lands into the ice not far from the base,
Carrington notifies the U.S. military and an Air Force crew is
despatched to investigate. The mysterious object turns out to be
a large circular spaceship of unknown origin, almost entirely buried
beneath the polar surface. To free the ship from the ice, Captain
Hendry gives the order for thermal explosives to be detonated, but
these merely destroy the craft. Amid the wreckage, a body is
discovered, perfectly preserved in a block of ice. Hendry's men
take the body back to the research base just as a severe Arctic storm
breaks. Carrington is eager to thaw the ice block so that he can
make a scientific examination of what is undoubtedly an alien life
form, but Hendry insists that no action is to be taken until he has
heard from his superiors. When its icy shroud is accidentally
melted by an electric blanket, the alien creature is revived and flees
into the stormy Arctic wasteland. In its escape, the creature is
attacked by sled dogs, which manage to rip off one of its arms.
Carrington's analysis of the severed arm reveals that the creature is
more vegetable than animal and that it has the means to reproduce
rapidly, by shedding seedpods from its skin. When the
blood-drained body of a sled dog is found in the base's greenhouse, a
terrible truth becomes apparent. The creature feeds on blood...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.