Film Review
When Robert De Niro asked director Martin Scorsese whether he would
like to make a film based on an autobiography by the former boxing
champion Jake La Motta he received an unequivocal response.
Scorsese had no interest in sport and found nothing in La Motta's
character or career that would induce him to make a film about
him. This was about the time Scorsese was working on
Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore.
Five years on, despite one massive success -
Taxi Driver (1976) - Scorsese
felt his career was over and was persuaded by producer Irwin Winkler to
adapt La Motta's book, purely for De Niro's benefit. Perhaps,
feeling that the best of his career was behind him, Scorsese saw
something of himself in the boxer's tragic decline from his
all-too-brief moment of glory. Certainly,
Raging Bull was to be one of the
director's most personal and intense films. It is also, arguably,
his one true masterpiece, one of the finest American films of the 1980s
- an ugly film to crown an ugly decade.
Raging Bull is a film that
pulls absolutely no punches. It tells Jake La Motta's life story
as it was lived and makes no attempt to gloss over the less attractive
aspects of the boxer's life and temperament. Photographed in
grainy black and white (in a way that resembles a low budget European
art film of the early 1960s), the film has a viscerally raw, almost
documentary-like, feel to it which is perfectly in keeping with its
subject matter. The stark realism of the boxing scenes
(heightened by some slick camerawork and razor-sharp editing) gives
them a near-the-knuckle brutality that borders on sadism. So
successfully does Scorsese convey the primal savagery of what some
still consider to be a noble sport that some of the sequences set in
the boxing ring are an agony to sit through. And yet the film's
depiction of La Motta's life outside the ring is just as
uncompromisingly tough and harrowing. Scorsese and his
screenwriter Paul Schrader do not waste time trying to make La Motta
into something he wasn't. The picture they paint of the boxer is
a man constantly at war with himself and the world, a man incapable of
sharing true intimacy with anyone else and who was always at the mercy
of his primitive macho instincts. It was La Motta who
first described himself as a raging bull, and this is exactly how the film
portrays him: a wild, untamable force of nature.
If
Raging Bull's no-nonsense
treatment of its grim subject matter is inclined to turn its audience
away in disgust, Robert De Niro's powerhouse performance compels us to
keep watching, to take the punishment the film doles out to us like a
boxer taking a repeated slugging in the face from his
opponent. This is De Niro at his most hideously
unattractive and the actor does nothing to endear his character to
us. His portrayal of La Motta is pure animal savagery, a man who
is as habitually violent and thick-skinned outside the ring as he is
within it. Again and again, De Niro fills us with revulsion as
his character lashes out, like a sick, deranged animal, at those
nearest to him. As his career takes a catastrophic nose dive, La Motta becomes
even more pathetic, a fat old lech who seems to be
constantly adrift from humanity. Only an actor of De Niro's
calibre and bravado would have the guts to portray La Motta in such an
unremittingly unattractive manner, and only De Niro could succeed in
making us feel something for him, as grotesque and shallow as he
is. The actor put on sixty pounds (over a four month period
during a break in the filming) to play the older La Motta, almost
ruining his own health in the process. Whilst the film owes almost everything to Robert De Niro's knockout
performance, we should not overlook the fine contributions from his
talented sparring partners. Joe Pesci, then a virtual unknown, is
superbly well-cast as La Motta's brother, making a strikingly
sympathetic contrast with De Niro's driven, almost psychotic
character. Likewise, in one of her earliest and most memorable
film roles, Cathy Moriarty serves to emphasise La Motta's darker nature
with her arresting portrayal of the boxer's brutalised but resilient
young wife. With such a strong cast, Scorsese could hardly fail
to deliver a stunning piece of film drama.
When it was first released in 1980,
Raging
Bull drew no end of adverse criticism on account of its violent
content, although there was a fair number of critics who instantly
recognised it for the masterpiece it was. Perhaps
predictably (on account of its bad publicity), the film fared poorly at
the box office and earned just over 23 million dollars, only five
million more than it cost to make. In spite of its mixed reviews
and lukewarm response from the cinemagoing public,
Raging Bull was nominated for eight
Oscars in 1981 (including Best Picture and Best Director) but only won
awards in two categories, Best Actor (Robert De Niro) and Best Editing
(Thelma Schoonmaker). (That year, the Best Picture and Best
Director Oscars went to
Ordinary
People, Robert Redford's directorial debut feature, and you have
to ask yourself:
why, oh why, oh why?)
Since its inauspicious first release,
Raging
Bull has grown considerably in stature and is now widely
recognised as one of the great classics of American cinema. Not
only is it the most authentic and compelling film about boxing to date,
it is also a powerfully moving study of a man struggling and failing to
come to grips with the most destructive aspects of male identity.
A sequel,
Raging Bull II,
based on Jake La Motte's follow-up autobiography, is currently in
production and planned for release in 2013. The film, which is
directed by Martin Guigui and features William Forsythe in the role of
La Motta, has drawn fire from MGM, who have filed a lawsuit to prevent
its release on the grounds that it presents itself as a sequel to the
earlier film and thereby infringes the company's original contract with
the former boxer. It looks as if La Motta will go on fighting
right till the end...
© James Travers 2012
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Next Martin Scorsese film:
The King of Comedy (1982)
Film Synopsis
In 1964, Jake La Motta ekes out a living as a third rate stand-up
comedian and raconteur. Overweight, prematurely aged and
physically drained, he is a shadow of the man he once was.
It is hard to believe that, only a decade ago, he was a world famous prize fighter, the man who
snatched the world middleweight championship title from Marcel Cerdan
in 1949. Jake's boxing career began to take off in the early
1940s. The poor kid from the Bronx was soon sparring with the
likes of Sugar Ray Robinson and earning big money through his Mafia
connections. But as Jake comes closer to fulfilling his
professional ambitions his personal life begins to fall apart.
When he suspects that his wife Vickie has been having an affair with
his brother-manager Joey, the boxer is overtaken by a jealous
rage. His marriage only just survives this crisis, but when
Jake's career hits the buffers he becomes increasingly estranged from
those closest to him. Shortly after opening a nightclub, he is
arrested on a vice charge and ends up in prison. Despite these
setbacks, Jake remains a fighter...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.