Film Review
Were it not for
Citizen Kane (1941), arguably
the greatest thing to come out of an American film studio,
Touch of Evil would surely rate as
Orson Welles's most inspired film, a thoroughly chilling portrayal of
police corruption and personal revenge that encompasses the visceral,
the seedy and the darkly surreal within the oppressive confines of its
warped and unutterably creepy noir dreamscape. The last of the
classic American films noirs is also one of the best, beginning
with what is probably the most imaginative and daring opening to any film - a
three minute crane tracking shot in which the camera follows a car
which is destined to explode across the Mexican-United States border, a
potent metaphor for the personal journey which the film's two opposing
protagonists (a narcotics agent and corrupt cop) will make in the
course of the film, from morose twilight into abject darkness.
Touch of Evil is easily
Welles's most unsettling film, as twisted and unpredictable as the
characters it portrays, more weird and eerily stylised than his
distinctive
Macbeth (1948), his
previous Hollywood offering. Assisted by his talented
cinematographer Russell Metty, Welles takes all the familiar film noir
motifs and blows them up to nightmarish proportions, the result being a
bold visual fantasy that is indistinguishable from a dream.
Extreme camera positioning (particularly the excessive use of low
shots) heighten the sense of the bizarre and the unreal, transforming
the villains of the piece into dangerous weirdos and insuperable
grotesques. Welles, now a corpulent Behemoth that dominates every
scene, assumes an almost godlike bearing - untouchable, omnipotent - as
the totally unscrupulous police chief Quinlan. How well he
resembles something foul from a children's fairytale, a wreck of a man
eaten away by ambition and resentment so that he is now nothing more
than a toad-faced troll skulking in the darkness, wreaking of evil,
soaking up the goodness from the world like a sponge of pure
malignancy. How much of Quinlan is Welles himself, the
misunderstood genius who made such an impact on 20th century
cinema but who found it so hard to make films in his native America? How tragic and yet how fitting that
Touch of Evil would be Welles's
last film to be shot for an American film studio.
Welles's is not the only memorable performance the film offers.
Charlton Heston is surprisingly effective as the morally ambiguous
narcotics officer, not a clear-cut heroic sort of the kind the actor is
best known for portraying, but a far more complex and mysterious
individual who feels just at home in the murky world of crime and
law-bending as Welles's noxious character. It is the interplay
between these two unfathomable custodians of right and wrong which
provides the film with its central dynamic and allows Welles to
construct one of the most brilliant denouements to any of his
films. Janet Leigh is the only thing that looks even
remotely human in this film, a fragile stray sheep lost in a world of
ugly macho nastiness, haplessly rehearsing the part she would later
play in Hitchcock's
Psycho (1960), complete with
sinister motel owner (Dennis Weaver at his most unhinged). The
film's exotic weirdness is magnificently crowned by an inspired cameo
appearance from Marlene Dietrich, revelling in the part of the gypsy
fortune teller (a Mexican who speaks with a German accent) - she says
far more than she knows when she tells Welles that he has no future.
As happened too often in his filmmaking career, Welles's original
conception for the film was badly compromised by the studio (this time
Universal) after he completed filming. Universal were unhappy
with the director's rough cut and sanctioned a re-edit, with additional
scenes added (directed not by Welles but by Harry Keller). This
original release of
Touch of Evil
proved to be a critical success in Europe but was not well-received in
the United States, where it was issued as a B-movie to a lesser film
titled
The Female Animal
(1958). Understandably, Welles was unhappy with this release and
drafted a 58-page memo in which he suggested changes that would improve
the film. Needless to say, the executives at Universal ignored
Welles's memo, although it was used to produce the re-cut of the film
which was released in 1998. This version of
Touch of Evil surpasses both the
original release and a subsequently rediscovered preview version, released in 1978.
Whilst it may fall somewhat short of its director's vision, it sits
comfortably alongside his other cinematic masterpieces, excelling not
only in its sheer visual artistry but also in its chillingly perceptive
understanding of the human psyche. Classic film noir could not
have hoped for a finer postscript than this.
© James Travers 2011
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Next Orson Welles film:
Le Procès (1962)
Film Synopsis
Miguel Vargas, a Mexican drugs enforcement official, is on his
honeymoon when a car is blown up right in front of his eyes, shortly
after crossing the border from Mexico into the United
States. Aware of the political ramifications, Vargas
occupies himself in the ensuing investigation, but soon runs up against
a distinguished American police chief, Captain Hank Quinlan. The
prime suspect is Sanchez, a Mexican who is married to the daughter of
the man who was killed in the explosion. After subjecting Sanchez
to a brutal interrogation in his apartment, Quinlan discovers two
sticks of dynamite which leave no doubt as to the Mexican's
guilt. Vargas is convinced that Quinlan planted the dynamite to
ensure a swift conviction and begins his own investigation into the
cop's previous cases. Realising the threat that Vargas poses,
Quinlan conceives an elaborate plan to have him
discredited...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.