Film Review
The emergence of the Nouveau Roman in French literature of the 1950s was
seen by some as a precursor to a similar revolution in the art of filmmaking.
The arrival of the French New Wave at the end of the decade certainly had
an impact but the extent to which this resulted in the birth of the anticipated
Nouveau Cinéma is a highly contentious issue. Of the
four figures most strongly associated with La Nouvelle Vague, only two (Jacques
Rivette and Jean-Luc Godard) can legitimately claim to have shifted the art
of cinema into new territory. The others (François
Truffaut and Claude Chabrol, together with most of their lesser
known cohorts on the Cahiers du cinéma) were content merely to develop
their own personalised kind of film within the rigid framework of conventional
cinema. In fact, it was not the New Wave innovators, but rather two
of the most influential instigators of the Nouveau Roman - Alain Robbe-Grillet
and
Marguerite Duras - who came
closest to achieving the expected cinematic revolution, and whilst most of
their film work is all but forgotten today, their influence endures, with
many of today's auteur filmmakers similarly committed to the project of extending
the boundaries of cinematic expression.
It was right at the start of the French New Wave that Alain Robbe-Grillet
first had an impact on cinema, through his remarkable collaboration with
director Alain Resnais -
L'Année dernière
à Marienbad (1961). Although Robbe-Grillet only contributed
the screenplay to the film, Resnais insisted on sharing the creative ownership
of the film with it, and with good reason. The film - a spectacularly
haunting evocation of mortality and lost love - contains (in graphic form)
many of the stylistic tropes that underpin Robbe-Grillet's idiosyncratic
literary art, most notably an absence of logic and objectivity, with plot
and character both conspicuous by their absence. Impossible though
it is to pin down with any precision,
Marienbad is a mesmerising masterpiece
and its unique oneiric artistry is what it made it an international hit.
This success allowed Robbe-Grillet to begin directing his own films, and
his equally unfathomable first feature
L'Immortelle (1962), similar
to his Resnais collaboration with its dreamlike interweaving of memories
and fantasies, won him the prestigious Prix Louis Delluc.
Robbe-Grillet then went on to direct his most commercially successful film,
Trans-Europ-Express. The immense popularity the film enjoyed
may have been largely down to its choice of lead actor, Jean-Louis Trintignant,
who had recently acquired international fame through his participation in
Claude Lelouch's Oscar winning arty confection
Un homme et une femme (1966),
the best-known film to have been made in France in the 1960s. In the
first of four films directed by Robbe-Grillet, Trintignant gets to appear
as both himself (a man in a crowd) and a first-time drugs smuggler in the
film-within-the-film. The idea of a film showing another film in the
process of being imagined into existence was hardly a new one. Julien
Duvivier had already pulled this off successfully over a decade before with
La Fête a Henriette
(1952), and this was remade two years before Robbe-Grillet's film by Hollywood
director Richard Quine as
Paris
When It Sizzles (1964).
Trans-Europ-Express is a pretty
blatant steal of Duvivier's film, but whereas Duvivier's objective had been
to critique the staid filmmaking conventions of his day, Robbe-Grillet uses
this as an opportunity for wild experimentation, in effect building on the
meta-cinema concepts introduced by Federico Fellini and Jean-Luc Godard in
their 1963 offerings
8½ and
Le Mépris.
Trans-Europ-Express begins with three people on a train starting to
thrash out ideas for their next film. These three are Alain Robbe-Grillet
himself (playing the film's writer-director), his real-life wife Catherine
Robbe-Grillet (as the coldly analytical production secretary) and small-time
Belgian producer Paul Louyet (effectively impersonating himself). They hit
upon the idea of making a film about an inexperienced drug smuggler, and
after dismissing a jokey comic book treatment, they settle down and bend
their minds to the task of putting together a coherent narrative. A
chance sighting of Jean-Louis Trintignant leads them to cast the actor in
the lead role without a moment's hesitation. Things get off to a promising
start but it isn't long before the plot starts to go off the rails, and every
time one plot inconsistency or weakness is resolved, another surfaces further
down the track within minutes. Coming up with a flawless plot seems
to be as fraught as trying to fix a leaky water pipe made out of colanders.
A keen proponent of S&M, Robbe-Grillet's thoughts seldom stray from his
lurid erotic fantasies, and so as well as having to carry a ramshackle thriller
intrigue with dodgy drugs dealers JLT is called upon to pay frequent visits
to a willing prostitute to indulge his taste for kinky sex. Marie-France
Pisier's seductive presence alone justifies these tastefully erotic digressions
but at the cost of weakening the film's coherence even further - the point
presumably being that an author's worst enemy is his susceptibility to auto-arousal.
Inevitably, the film-within-the-film ends in a virtually identical manner
to
À bout de souffle
(1960), Jean-Luc Godard's more restrained attempt at film deconstruction
- with the hero being betrayed by his gorgeous bedfellow, cornered by the
police and then dying - as comically as possible - when a bullet hit him.
The film's author seems mighty pleased with himself when he and his colleagues
descend the train, apparently oblivious to the monumental train-wreck of
a narrative that he has just spent the past few hours mulling over.
Beautifully filmed in the lushest of lush black-and-white,
Trans-Europ-Express
has the seductively stylish realist sheen that we associate with the
early Nouvelle Vague era, the location exteriors (especially those shot at
night) serving to make the town of Antwerp the most interesting character
on screen (every other character - even JLT's - is laughably two-dimensional,
more by design than accident). The film's rich aesthetics appeal to
our artistic sensibilities but they can scarcely hope to deflect from the
lack of narrative substance. Au contraire, these are mischievously
employed to draw our attention to this seeming defect, continually reminding
us that what we are watching in the film-within-the-film is pure phony-baloney,
a shallow attempt at mass entertainment that is as flimsy as a ten-storey
house of cards. The ease with the plot becomes derailed, the clumsy
attempts to patch up the narrative, the implausible behaviour of the characters
and ultimately the film's staggering inability to differentiate between farce
and tragedy... Robbe-Grillet is positively revelling in the sheer pointless
absurdity of trying to construct a coherent film narrative on conventional,
linear lines.
By contrast Robbe-Grillet's own film,
Trans-Europ-Express viewed in
its entirety (as distinct from the B-movie monstrosity created within the
film), is the more robust track that cinema should be following. What
Robbe-Grillet argues for is the drastic demotion of fictional conceits -
plot and character - to mere incidentals (MacGuffins as Hitchcock would call
them), thereby allowing the artist to focus on the real substance of the
film. Like the Nouveau Roman, this New Cinema requires that the consumer
is as actively involved in the creative process as the instigating author
- it is the spectator who must work to interpret what the author offers if
the film is to have any deeper meaning. Having demonstrated - with the typical
in-your-face bravado of a true genius - the futility of creating a fictional
narrative, Robbe-Grillet then went on to show how hard it is to construct
real personal narratives in
L'Homme
qui ment (1968), arguably his most profound and innovative film.
© James Travers 2022
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Film Synopsis
A writer-director meets up with his film producer and production
secretary at Paris's busy Gare du Nord and together they take the Trans-Europ
Express to the Belgian town of Antwerp. During the trip, they discuss
their next project and attempt to thrash out a storyline, inspired by a chance
sighting of the actor Jean-Louis Trintignant. In the proposed film,
Trintignant will play a rookie drug smuggler named Elias who is tasked with
shipping a consignment of cocaine from the French capital to Antwerp by train.
On his arrival in the Belgian town, Elias will meet up with a succession
of shady-looking contacts who use this first assignment to test his loyalty
and suitability for this line of work. Elias whiles away his empty
hours by roaming the town and hooking up with a very desirable prostitute
named Eva. Sessions involving bondage and simulated rape are all that
Elias requires of Eva, and she agrees to this willingly.
Elias finally gets to meet his number one contact, and having been shown
to be a dependable smuggler, he is directed back to Paris with another lucrative
package. Before he goes, Elias pays Eva one last visit, only to discover
that she has betrayed him to the police. After strangling the prostitute
whilst enacting one of his erotic fantasies, Elias goes into hiding, but
cannot resist being lured to a strip club to watch an erotic performance
by a woman bearing a striking resemblance to Eva. All too late Elias
realises he has been caught in a trap. As the police move to arrest
him his contact shoots him dead. The authors of this fictional intrigue
appear satisfied with their work by the time they return to Paris.
Not far from them, Jean-Louis Trintignant can be seen embracing a young woman
who looks uncannily like Eva.
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.