Film Review
With Hammer's resurrection of the old horror icons Dracula and
Frankenestein's monster proving phenomenally successful other creature
revivals were bound to follow.
Universal's third most popular ghoul, the Mummy, was next up for the Hammer reboot, with Christopher
Lee completing a hat-trick of spine-tingling monster portrayals within
three years. This time round, the emphasis is much more on
delivering cheap thrills than in telling a coherent, believable story,
so whilst Hammer's revamp of Universal's
The
Mummy (1932) is fun it lacks the commitment and
sophistication of the studio's previous
The Curse of Frankenstein
(1957) and
Dracula (1958).
The Mummy suffers somewhat
from the fact that its ghoulish protagonist is the least interesting of
Hammer's movie monsters. It's essentially just a dumb walking
corpse that goes around strangling people at the request of its master
- not much scope for character development there.
Robbed of the power of speech, with most of his face hidden by layers of latex, Christopher
Lee is only called upon to look menacing (something he does superbly),
and so you could hardly describe the Mummy as a well-rounded
character. Peter Cushing is better served as the dusty
archaeologist with an implausibly good taste in women (he happens to
have married the one person who is the spitting image of the princess
the Mummy once had a crush on), but even he struggles to make his
character interesting.
Adding to the impression that
The
Mummy was thrown together in too much of a hurry by a company
out to make a quick buck with the least effort, the film's production
values are well below par for Hammer. Studio bound, many of the
exterior scenes appear shoddy and unconvincing, particularly the jungle
set which looks distinctly phoney. The funeral procession we see
in an overlong and somewhat unnecessary flashback sequence shows up the
budgetary constraints too clearly - the hilarious procession of
hardboard and polystyrene doesn't so much suggest artefacts of Tut as
items of tat. Even the film's most iconic scene, the Mummy
emerging from a swamp, is marred by poor lighting and cheap set design.
Whilst
The Mummy fails to
match up to the excellence of Hammer's previous Gothic horror offerings
it still manages to be an enjoyable romp, the sheer absurdity of its
plot adding to its entertainment value. Cushing and Lee are as
commanding as ever, aided by a supporting cast that appears to have an
even less tenuous grip on reality. George Pastell very nearly
steals the film as the Mummy's menacing minder and, as the token
female, Yvonne Furneaux brings a touch of old-fashioned glamour to the
proceedings. Terence Fisher directs the film as well as he can,
but with unconvincing sets and a weak script he has his work cut out
for him.
The Mummy is a
middling horror amusement and it should definitely have stayed in the
bog where it ends up. Unfortunately, Hammer couldn't let sleeping
eviscerated Egyptian corpses lie, and so three dismal sequels ensued:
The Curse of the Mummy's Tomb (1964),
The Mummy's Shroud
(1966) and
Blood from the Mummy's Tomb (1971).
Some graves should just be left unopened.
© James Travers 2014
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.
Next Terence Fisher film:
The Brides of Dracula (1960)
Film Synopsis
In 1895, the eminent English archaeologist Stephen Banning and his son John
are surveying the wonders of ancient Egypt when they come across the lost
tomb of the Princess Ananka, high priestess of the Egyptian god Karnak.
Ignoring warnings of dire retribution from a local man, Mehemet Bey, Banning
senior enters the tomb and is delighted with the discovery of an ancient
relic, the Scroll of Life. Alerted by a sudden scream, the other members
of the expedition follow the archaeologist into the tomb and are horrified
to find him in a deep catatonic state.
It isn't until Stephen Banning is safely back in England, tended to in a
nursing home, that he comes out of his trance-like state. He confides
in his son that on reading the Scroll of Life in Ananka's tomb he brought
back to life the mummified Kharis, the high priest of Karnak. The latter
was entombed with the princess after her death for daring to love her.
His punishment for attempting to resurrect the princess is perpetual life,
and now he is forced to do the bidding of whoever possesses the Scroll of
Life. It so happens that this ancient artefact is now in the possession
of Mehemet Bey, who intends punishing the Bannings for defiling the sacred
tomb of Ananka.
It isn't long before the single-minded Mehemet has traced the Bannings to
their quiet corner of England. He uses the ancient scroll to revive
the dormant Kharis - whose appearance is hardly improved after accidentally
falling into a swamp - and then orders him to murder Stephen Banning.
When another member of the expedition is slain in front of his own eyes,
John Banning realises that his life is in great danger. Unfortunately,
the local police find it hard to accept his fantastic story about a rampaging
killer mummy. It is only a question of time before Kharis returns to
Banning's house to claim his third victim. By an odd quirk of fate,
the archaeologist's wife Isobel is the exact likeness of the Princess Ananka...
© James Travers
The above content is owned by frenchfilms.org and must not be copied.